Export 425 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is W  [Clear All Filters]
Journal Article
PDF icon v08n2p155.pdf (594.04 KB)
Sireci, S. G., Wainer, H.,, & Thissen, D.. (1991). On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237-247.
Wainer, H.,. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf’s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.
Wood, R. L. (1973). Response-contingent testing. Review of Educational Research, 43, 529-544.
Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Huebner, A.. (2011). Restrictive Stochastic Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 255–273. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00145.x
Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S.. (1997). The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.
Wise, S. L., Ponsoda, V., & Olea, J.. (2002). Self-adapted testing: An overview. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 12, 107-122.
Wang, C., Fan, Z., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J. A.. (2013). A Semiparametric Model for Jointly Analyzing Response Times and Accuracy in Computerized Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 381-417. doi:10.3102/1076998612461831
Wiberg, M. (2006). Sequential Computerized Mastery Tests—Three Simulation Studies. International Journal of Testing, 6, 41-55. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0601_3
Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Sequential Testing for Selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(3), 337-351.
PDF icon v06n3p337.pdf (1.59 MB)
Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Sequential testing for selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 337-351.
PDF icon v18n2p121.pdf (2.08 MB)
Wainer, H.,. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
PDF icon Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
PDF icon Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)
Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
Wainer, H.,, & Lewis, C.. (1990). Toward a psychometrics for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 1-14.
Walter, O. B., & Holling, H.. (2008). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
PDF icon Transitioning from Fixed-Length Questionnaires to Computer-Adaptive Versions.pdf (214.47 KB)
Wise, S. L. (1994). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.
PDF icon gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)
Ward, W. C. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(2), 16-20.
Wei, H., & Lin, J.. (2015). Using Out-of-Level Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 15(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.979492
H., Q., Staniewska, D., Reckase, M., & Woo, A.. (2016). Using Response Time to Detect Item Preknowledge in Computer?Based Licensure Examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice., 35(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12102
Wise, S. L. (2014). The Utility of Adaptive Testing in Addressing the Problem of Unmotivated Examinees. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(1), 1-17. doi:10.7333/1401-02010001
Hsu, C. - L., Wang, W. - C., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2013). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 563-582. doi:10.1177/0146621613488642
Hsu, C. - L., & Wang, W. - C.. (2015). Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the Higher Order DINA Model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 125–143. doi:10.1111/jedm.12069
Miscellaneous
Weiss, D. J., & Betz, N. E.. (1973). Ability measurement: Conventional or adaptive? (Research Report 73-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we73-01.pdf (4.69 MB)
Brown, J. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). An adaptive testing strategy for achievement test batteries (Research Rep No 77-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon br77-6.pdf (2.35 MB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ki79-05.pdf (2.1 MB)
Kiely, G. L., Zara, A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). An alternate-forms reliability and concurrent validity comparison of Bayesian adaptive and conventional ability tests (Research Report 80-5). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ki80-05.pdf (1.09 MB)
Weiss, D. J. (1977). Applications of computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon we77-01.pdf (3.15 MB)
Wright, B. D., & Douglas, G. A.. (1975). Best test design and self-tailored testing (Research Memorandum No 19). Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Education, Statistical Laboratory.
Weiss, D. J., & McBride, J. R.. (1983). Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 83-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon we83-02.pdf (1.04 MB)
PDF icon be77-05.pdf (1.81 MB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ki80-04.pdf (1.86 MB)

Pages