Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
T
Luo, X., & Kim, D.. (2018). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2002). To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ch02-01.pdf (251.46 KB)
Deng, H., & Ansley, T.. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon de03-01.pdf (185.22 KB)
Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
Eggen, T. (2010). Three-Category Adaptive Classification Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 373-387). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
PDF icon Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
PDF icon Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of two-stage testing. Psychometrika, 36, 227-242.
Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of the measurement effectiveness of flexilevel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 805-813.
Steffen, M., & Way, W. D.. (1999). Test-taking strategies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Steffen, M. (1999). Test-taking strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2003). Test-score comparability, ability estimation, and item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1990). Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.
Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Wainer, H.,, Bradlow, E. T., & Du, Z.. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 245-270). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
Luecht, R., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA Examination. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 189-202. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2
Luecht, R. M., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2002). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA examination. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.. New Orleans.
PDF icon lu02-01.pdf (191.34 KB)
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z.. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436. presented at the Sep.
PDF icon mcb01-12.pdf (893.86 KB)
Stone, C. A. (1989). Testing software review: MicroCAT Version 3. . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8 (3), 33-38.
Wainer, H.,, & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Thissen, D., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1990). Testing algorithms. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Laurier, M. (1999). Testing adaptatif et évaluation des processus cognitifs. In . C. Depover and B. Noël (Éds) : L’évaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs - Modèles, pratiques et contextes. Bruxelles : De Boeck Université.
Simms, L. (2001). Testing a computerized adaptive personality inventory using simulated response data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco CA.
Lord, F. M. (1976). Test theory and the public interest. Proceedings of the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference.
Lunz, M. E., Stahl, J. A., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1993). Test targeting and precision before and after review on computer-adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Guo, F., Way, W. D., & Reshetar, R.. (2000). Test security and the development of computerized tests. In Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education invited symposium: Maintaining test security in computerized programs–Implications for practice. New Orleans.
Kalohn, J. (2000). Test security and item exposure control for computer-based . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Educatio. Chicago.
Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2009). Test overlap rate and item exposure rate as indicators of test security in CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09barrada.pdf (260.26 KB)
Luecht, R. M., & Clauser, B. E.. (2002). Test models for complex computer-based testing. In . C. N. Mille,. M. T. Potenza, J. J. Fremer, and W. C. Ward (Eds.). Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Luecht, R. M., & Burgin, W. L.. (2003). Test information targeting strategies for adaptive multistage testlet designs. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon lu03-03.pdf (178.13 KB)
Stricker, L. J.,, & Bejar, I. I.. (2004). Test difficulty and stereotype threat on the GRE General Test. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 563-597.
Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Test development exposure control for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J.. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.
Verschoor, A., Radtke, I., & Eggen, T.. (2011). A Test Assembly Model for MST. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Verschoor Radtke Eggen Test Assmebly Model.pdf (339.24 KB)
Powell, Z. E. (1992). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. In Richmond IN: Indiana University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334910 and/or TM018223). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (1996). Test adaptativos informatizados [Computerized adaptive testing]. In Psicometría. Madrid, UNED: Universitas.
Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Termination criteria in computerized adaptive tests: Variable-length CATs are not biased. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09babcock.pdf (280.59 KB)

Pages