Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
H
Chuah, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Luecht, R.. (2006). How Big Is Big Enough? Sample Size Requirements for CAST Item Parameter Estimation. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 241-255. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_5
Reckase, M. D. (2017). How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu
Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S.. (2019). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
Blais, J. G. (2002). Historique et concepts propres au testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing: Historical accounts and concepts]. In Presented at the 69th Congress of the Acfas. Sherbrooke: Association canadienne française pour l’avancement des sciences (Acfas). [In French].
Stone, G. E. (1994). The historical developments of fit and its assessment in the computerized adaptive testing environment. In Midwestern Education Research Association annual meeting. presented at the 10/1994, Chicago, IL USA.
Krishnan, E. (2011). High-throughput Health Status Measurement using CAT in the Era of Personal Genomics: Opportunities and Challenges. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Health Care Krishnan.pdf (2.84 MB)
Luecht, R. M., Nungester, R. J., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). Heuristics based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1996). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1996). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Chien, Y., Shin, D., & Way, W. D.. (2011). A Heuristic Of CAT Item Selection Procedure For Testlets. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Item Selection Chien Shin Way.pdf (209.21 KB)
Born, S., & Frey, A.. (2017). Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 241-262. doi:10.1177/0013164416643744
van der Linden, W. J. (1999). Het ontwerpen van adaptieve examens [Designing adaptive tests]. In . J. M Pieters, Tj. Plomp, and L.E. Odenthal (Eds.), Twintig jaar Toegepaste Onderwijskunde: Een kaleidoscopisch overzicht van Twents onderwijskundig onderzoek (pp. 249-267). Enschede: Twente University Press.
DeWitt, L. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.
G
Talento-Miller, E., & Guo, F.. (2009). Guess what? Score differences with rapid replies versus omissions on a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09talento-miller.pdf (214.05 KB)
Verschoor, A. (2017). Grow a Tiger out of Your CAT . In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Lewy, A., & Doron, R.. (1977). Group tailored tests and some problems of their utlization. In Third international Symposium on Educational testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
Mills, C. N., & Steffen, M.. (2000). The GRE computer adaptive test: Operational issues. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 75-99). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J.. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-37.
Han, K. T. (2009). Gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing (No. RR-09-07). GMAC Research Reports. McLean, VA. USA: Graduate Management Admissions Council.
Han, K. T. (2009). A gradual maximum information ratio approach to item selection in computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09han.pdf (390.32 KB)
Samejima, F. (1976). The graded response model of latent trait theory and tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 5-17). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Xiao, B. (1989). Golden section search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Fifth International Objective Measurement Workshop. Berkeley CA.
Thomasson, G. L. (1997). The goal of equity within and between computerized adaptive tests and paper and pencil forms. . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Chang, H. - H. (1995). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(3), 213-229.
PDF icon v20n3p213.pdf (1.91 MB)
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1996). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 213-229.
Krass, I. A. (1997). Getting more precision on computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the 62nd Annual meeting of Psychometric Society. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E.. (1990). Generative adaptive testing with digit span items. San Diego, CA: Testing Systems Department, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Gierl, M., & Bulut, O.. (2017). Generating Rationales to Support Formative Feedback in Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1O5KDFtQlDLvhNoDr7X4JO4arpJkIHKUP
Embretson, S. E. (2002). Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In P. Kyllomen, Item generation for test development (pp. 219-250). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Reckase, M. D. (1978). A generalization of sequential analysis to decision making with tailored testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Military Testing Association. Oklahoma City OK.
Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. - W., Chen, J. - H., & Liu, T. - C.. (2014). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494
PDF icon v18n2p121.pdf (2.08 MB)
F
Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: The Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1-5(National Council of State Boards of Nursing).
Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Fan, M., & Zhu.,. (2002). A further study on adjusting CAT item selection starting point for individual examinees. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Barnard, J. J. (2018). From Simulation to Implementation: Two CAT Case Studies. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 23(14). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=23&n=14
Pommerich, M., & Burden, T.. (2000). From simulation to application: Examinees react to computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. New Orleans, April 2000.
Wise, S. L. (2011). From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Wise From Reliability to Validity.pdf (619.18 KB)
Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T.. (2017). From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ
Bejar, I. I. (1995). From adaptive testing to automated scoring of architectural simulations. In . L. E. Mancall and P. G. Bashook (Eds.), Assessing clinical reasoning: The oral examination and alternative methods (pp. 115-130. Evanston IL: The American Board of Medical Specialities.
Thompson, N. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (2011). A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 16.
PDF icon Thompson-Weissv16n1.pdf (191.79 KB)
Luecht, R. M. (1998). A framework for exploring and controlling risks associated with test item exposure over time. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
Han, K. T. (2020). Framework for Developing Multistage Testing With Intersectional Routing for Short-Length Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 87-102. doi:10.1177/0146621619837226
Stocking, M. L. (1998). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Hornke, L. F. (1977). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing strategies. In Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing. University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hornke, L. F. (1979). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing. Programmed Larning and Educational Technology, 16, 164-169.

Pages