Weiss, D. J., & Betz, N. E.. (1973). Ability measurement: Conventional or adaptive? (Research Report 73-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kim-Kang, G., & Weiss, D. J.. (2008). Adaptive measurement of individual change. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216, 49-58. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.49

Weiss, D. J., & Vale, C. D.. (1987). Adaptive testing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36, 249-262.

Weiss, D. J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 774-789.

Weiss, D. J. (1976). Adaptive testing research at Minnesota: Overview, recent results, and future directions. In . C. L. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 24-35). Washington DC: United States Civil Service Commission.

Brown, J. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). An adaptive testing strategy for achievement test batteries (Research Rep No 77-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kiely, G. L., Zara, A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). An alternate-forms reliability and concurrent validity comparison of Bayesian adaptive and conventional ability tests (Research Report 80-5). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Weiss, D. J. (1977). Applications of computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Weiss, D. J. (2011). Better Data From Better Measurements Using Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, Vol. 2(No. 1), 1-27.

Weiss, D. J., & McBride, J. R.. (1984). Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 273-285.

Weiss, D. J., & McBride, J. R.. (1984). Bias and Information of Bayesian Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(3), 273-285.

Weiss, D. J., & McBride, J. R.. (1983). Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 83-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (1977). Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kim-Kang, G., & Weiss, D. J.. (2007). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.

Pine, S. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Weiss, D. J. (1975). Computerized adaptive ability measurement. Naval Research Reviews, 28, 1-18.

Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 70-84.

Weiss, D. J., & Vale, C. D.. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing for measuring abilities and other psychological variables. In . J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized personality measurement: A practitioners guide (pp. 325-343). New York: Basic Books.

Weiss, D. J., & Gibbons, R. D.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing with the bifactor model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Weiss, D. J. (1975). Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and prospects (Research Report 75-5). In . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bejar, I. I., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Thompson, J. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Guyer, R. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Pine, S. M., Church, A. T., Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1975). An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Larkin, K. C., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1973). An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Maurelli, V. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Weiss, D. J. (1983). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Weiss, D. J. (1981). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Weiss, D. J. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Weiss, D. J. (1980). Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Thompson, N. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (2011). A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 16.

DeWitt, L. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.

Nydick, S. W., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). A hybrid simulation procedure for the development of CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Weiss, D. J. (1995). Improving individual differences measurement with item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. In . D. Lubinski and R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 49-79). Palo Alto CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473-492.

Weiss, D. J. (1969). Individualized assessment of differential abilities. In Paper presented at the 77th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Gialluca, K. A.. (1977). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Weiss, D. J. (1985). Introduction. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.

Finkelman, M., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2009). Item selection and hypothesis testing for the adaptive measurement of change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844

Weiss, D. J., & Guyer, R. D.. (2010). Manual for CATSim: Comprehensive simulation of computerized adaptive testing. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.

Weiss, D. J., & Von Minden, S.. (2011). Measuring Individual Growth With Conventional and Adaptive Tests. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 2(1), 80-101.

Weiss, D. J., & Brown, J. M.. (1977). Multi-Content Adaptive Measurement of Achievement. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Weiss, D. J. (1983). New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing. New York: Academic Press.

Johnson, M. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Parallel forms reliability and measurement accuracy comparison of adaptive and conventional testing strategies. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 16-34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Trabin, T. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). The person response curve: Fit of individuals to item response theory models. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 83-108). New York: Academic Press.

Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1984). Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.