Export 480 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is S  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
G
Samejima, F. (1976). The graded response model of latent trait theory and tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 5-17). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Mills, C. N., & Steffen, M.. (2000). The GRE computer adaptive test: Operational issues. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 75-99). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
H
Chien, Y., Shin, D., & Way, W. D.. (2011). A Heuristic Of CAT Item Selection Procedure For Testlets. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Item Selection Chien Shin Way.pdf (209.21 KB)
Stone, G. E. (1994). The historical developments of fit and its assessment in the computerized adaptive testing environment. In Midwestern Education Research Association annual meeting. presented at the 10/1994, Chicago, IL USA.
I
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1999). Impact of flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1998). The impact of scoring flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Spoden, C., Frey, A., & Bernhardt, R.. (2018). Implementing Three CATs Within Eighteen Months. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(3), 38-55. presented at the 09/2018. doi:10.7333/1809-060338
Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1997). Incorporating decision consistency into Bayesian sequential testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.
Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2003). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT’s item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon li03-02.pdf (417.96 KB)
Li, F., Cohen, A., & Shen, L.. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x
Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee FL: Florida State University.
Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee: Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University.
Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu.,. (2001). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in a realistic second-order equitable CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu, Y.. (2002). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). Item calibration considerations: A comparison of item calibrations on written and computerized adaptive examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Sympson, J. B., & l. Hartmann,. (1982). Item Calibrations for Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Experimental Item Pools Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon sy82-01.pdf (104.17 KB)
Hetter, R. D., & Sympson, J. B.. (1997). Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. In J. R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141-144). Washington D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
Morrison, C., Subhiyah, R,, & Nungester, R.. (1995). Item exposure rates for unconstrained and content-balanced computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Schmidt, F. L., & Urry, V. W.. (1976). Item parameterization procedures for the future. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 107-112.). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon sc75-01.pdf (330.67 KB)
Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., & Hetter, D. H.. (1997). Item pool development and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 117-130). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Segall, D. O. (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
Shi, Y. (2017). Item Response Time on Task Effect in CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Pages