Zwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Wingersky, M.. (1994). DIF analysis for pretest items in computer-adaptive testing (Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 94-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Zwick, R. (1992). Differential item functioning analysis for computer-adaptive tests and other IRT-scored measures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Military Testing Association. San Diego CA.

Zickar, M. J., Overton, R. C., Taylor, L. R., & Harms, H. J.. (1999). The development of a computerized adaptive selection system for computer programmers in a financial services company. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olsen (Eds.), Innvoations in computerized assessment (p. 7-33). Mahwah NJ Erlbaum.

Yen, Y. C., Ho, R. G., Chen, L. J., Chou, K. Y., & Chen, Y. L.. (2010). Development and evaluation of a confidence-weighting computerized adaptive testing. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 163–176.

Xiao, B. (1990). Dichotomous search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Williams, V. S. L. (1999). The development and cognitive evaluation of an audio-assisted computer-adaptive test for eight-grade mathematics. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wendt, A., Kao, S., Gorham, J., & Woo, A.. (2009). Developing item variants: An empirical study. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Way, W. D., Steffen, M., & Anderson, G. S.. (1998). Developing, maintaining, and renewing the item inventory to support computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the colloquium. Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments, Philadelphia PA.

Waters, B. K. (1980). Discussion: Session 1. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 51-55). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Ware, J. E., J., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M.. (1999). Dynamic health assessments: The search for more practical and more precise outcomes measures. Quality of Life Newsletter, 11-13.

Wang, J., Weiss, D. J., & Wang, C.. (2017). DIF-CAT: Doubly Adaptive CAT Using Subgroup Information to Improve Measurement Precision. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Gu4FR06qM5EZNp_Ns0Kt3HzBqWAv3LPy

Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Boughton, K. A.. (2013). Deriving Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 99-122. doi:10.1177/0146621612463422

Walter, O. B., Becker, J., Bjorner, J. B., Fliege, H., Klapp, B. F., & Rose, M.. (2007). Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for “Anxiety” (Anxiety-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 16, 143-155.

Vispoel, W. P. (1993). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test of tonal memory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 111-136.

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2010). Designing Item Pools for Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 231-245). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2000). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 149–162). Dendrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (1999). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 99-03 ). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Veerkamp, W. J. J., & Glas, C. E. W.. (2000). Detection of known items in adaptive testing with a statistical quality control method. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 373-389.

van der Linden, W. J. (1997). Detection of aberrant response patterns in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Vale, C. D. (1981). Design and implementation of a microcomputer-based adaptive testing system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 13, 399-406.

Vale, C. D. (1980). Development and evaluation of an adaptive testing strategy for use in multidimensional interest assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota. Dissertational Abstract International, 42(11-B), 4248-4249.

Vale, C. D. (1982). Design of a Microcomputer-Based Adaptive Testing System. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 360-371). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.

Vale, C. D. (1985). Development of a microcomputer-based adaptive testing system: Phase II Implementation (Research Report ONR 85-5). St. Paul MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2007). The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 49.

de la Torre Sanchez, R. (1992). The development and evaluation of a system for computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 4304.

Thompson, N. (2017). Developing a CAT: An Integrated Perspective. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Jv8bpH2zkw5TqSMi03e5JJJ98QtXf-Cv

Thissen, D. (2002). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement. ” Bethesda, Maryland, June 23-25.

Tatsuoka, K., & Birenbaum, M.. (1979). The danger of relying solely on diagnostic adaptive testing when prior and subsequent instructional methods are different (CERL Report E-5). Urbana IL: Univeristy of Illinois, Computer-Based Education Research Laboratory.

Tatsuoka, K. K., & Tatsuoka, M. M.. (1997). Diagnostic adaptive testing: Effects of remedial instruction as empirical validation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 3-20.

Swygert, K. (1997). Detecting misbehaving items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL.

Sutherland, L. A., Campbell, M., Ornstein, K., Wildemuth, B., & Lobach, D.. (2001). Development of an adaptive multimedia program to collect patient health data. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 21, 320-324.

Sumbling, M., Sanz, P., Viladrich, M. C., Doval, E., & Riera, L.. (2007). Development of a multiple-component CAT for measuring foreign language proficiency (SIMTEST). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Strong, S. D. (2000). The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 3938.

Stoop, E. M. L. A. (2001). Detection of misfitting item-score patterns in computerized adaptive testing. Enschede, The Netherlands: Febodruk B.

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Whitaker, M., Kim, D. - I., Zhang, L., & Choi, S. W.. (2014). Determining the Overall Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 419–440. doi:10.1111/jedm.12052

Simms, L. J. (2002). DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF A COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE VERSION OF THE SCHEDULE FOR NONADAPTIVE AND ADAPTIVE PERSONALITY. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa.

Simms, L. J. (2003). Development, reliability, and validity of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63, 3485.

Sijtsma, K. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. In . F. Drasgow and J. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Schreiber, M. D., Schneider, R. J., Schweizer, A., Beckmann, J. F., & Baltissen, R.. (2000). Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.

School-Renaissance-Institute,. (2001). The Development of STAR Early Literacy: A report of the School Renaissance Institute. Madison, WI: Author.

Robin, F. (2000). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Methods Research Report No 391). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Robin, F. (2001). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Riley, B. B., & Carle, A. C.. (2011). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Reckase, M. D. (2007). The design of p-optimal item banks for computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF file, 211 KB}.

Reckase, M. D. (2010). Designing item pools to optimize the functioning of a computerized adaptive test. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 127-141.

Reckase, M. D. (1982). Discussion: Adaptive and sequential testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 290-294). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Pitkin, A. K., & Vispoel, W. P.. (2001). Differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 235-247.

Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Chie, W. C., Conroy, T., Costantini, A., et al.. (2010). Development of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning dimension. Quality of Life Research , 20, 479-490.

Patsula, L. N., & McLeod, L. D.. (2000). Detecting test-takers who have memorized items in computerized-adaptive testing and muti-stage testing: A comparison. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Patience, W. M. (1977). Description of components in tailored testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 153-157.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S.. (2008). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Parshall, C. G., & Harmes, J. C.. (2007). Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2017). The Development of MST Test Information for the Prediction of Test Performances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 570-586. doi:10.1177/0013164416662960

Novick, M. R. (1980). Discussion: Session 3. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 140-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.

Nering, M. L. (1997). The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 115-127.

Mislevy, R. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). Does adaptive testing violate local independence?. Psychometrika, 65, 149-156.

Mislevy, R. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (1998). Does adaptive testing violate local independence? (Research Report 98-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Mislevy, J. L., Rupp, A. A., & Harring, J. R.. (2012). Detecting Local Item Dependence in Polytomous Adaptive Data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00165.x

Mills, C. N. (1999). Development and introduction of a computer adaptive Graduate Record Examination General Test. In . F. Drasgow and J .B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 117-135). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.