Export 231 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is E  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
L
Lu, Y., & Robin, F.. (2003). Evaluating a new approach to detect aberrant responses in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
Lu, Y., Pitoniak, M., Rizavi, S., Way, W. D., & Steffan, M.. (2003). Evaluating computerized adaptive testing design for the MCAT with realistic simulated data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon lu03-01.pdf (984.95 KB)
Luecht, R. M. (2003). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Luecht, R. M. (2003). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL. USA.
PDF icon lu03-04.pdf (115.22 KB)
PDF icon v16n1p033.pdf (584.06 KB)
Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1994). An empirical study of computerized adaptive test administration conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 251-263. presented at the Fal.
Lunz, M. E., & Bergstrom, B. A.. (1995). Equating computerized adaptive certification examinations: The Board of Registry series of studies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
M
McBride, J. R., Corpe, V. A., & Wing, H.. (1987). Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.
McBride, J. R. (1995). Equating the computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco. CA.
McBride, J. R. (1994). Early psychometric research in the CAT-ASVAB Project. In Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles. CA.
McBride, J. R. (1979). An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 21st Military Testing Association Conference. SanDiego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
McBride, J. R., & Hogan, P. F.. (1992). Evaluation of alternative operational concepts. In . Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
N
Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L. A.. (2004). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
Nering, M. L. (1996). The effects of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
O
Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (7-A), 4257.
P
Park, R., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2014). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545
Paterson, J. J. (1962). An evaluation of the sequential method of testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Effects of program parameters and item pool characteristics on the bias of a three-parameter tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Boston MA, U.
Pine, S. M., Church, A. T., Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon pi79-02.pdf (2.27 MB)
Potenza, M. (1994). The exploration of an alternative method for scoring computer adaptive tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska.
Prestwood, J. S. (1977). Effects of Knowledge of Results and Varying Proportion Correct on Ability Test Performance and Psychological Variables. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon pr77108.pdf (446.39 KB)
Puhan, G., & Gierl, M.. (2003). Evaluating the comparability of English- and French-speaking examinees on a science achievement test administered using two-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon pu03-01.pdf (567.05 KB)
R
PDF icon ra02-03.pdf (366.98 KB)
Reckase, M. D. (1976). The effect of item pool characteristics on the operation of a tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Murray Hill NJ.
Reckase, M. D. (1975). The effect of item choice on ability estimation when using a simple logistic tailored testing model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.
PDF icon v05n1p011.pdf (707.62 KB)
Reese, C. M. (1993). Establishing time limits for the GRE computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Reese, L. M., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1996). An evaluation of a two-stage testlet design for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.
Rizavi, S. M. (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
Rizavi, S., & Swaminathan, H.. (2001). The effect of test and examinee characteristics on the occurrence of aberrant response patterns in a computerized adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Rocklin, T. R., & O’Donnell, A. M.. (1991). An empirical comparison of self-adapted and maximum information item selection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S., & Wise, S. L.. (1992). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. San Francisco.
Rudner, L. M. (2009). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09rudner.pdf (202.22 KB)
Rudner, L. M. (2002). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
PDF icon ru02-01.pdf (45.1 KB)
S
Samejima, F. (2001). Effective use of simulated data in an on-line item calibration in practical situations of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Samejima, F. (2001). Efficient on-line item calibration using a nonparametric method adjusted to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.
Segall, D. O. (1995). The effects of item compromise on computerized adaptive test scores. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Orlando, FL.
Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 181-198). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Segall, D. O. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Experiences and lessons learned. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
Segall, D. O., & Carter, G.. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Issues and approach. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
Segall, D. O. (1997). The effects of motivation on equating adaptive and conventional tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Expected losses for individuals in Computerized Mastery Testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.

Pages