Kingsbury, G. G. (2011). Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2004). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2007). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2004). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.

Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.

Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J.. (2011). Practitioner’s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Hagge, S., Woo, A., & Dickison, P.. (2011). Impact of Item Drift on Candidate Ability Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W.. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in α-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.

Huitzing, H. A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.

Colvin, K., Keller, L. A., & Robin, F.. (2016). Effect of Imprecise Parameter Estimation on Ability Estimation in a Multistage Test in an Automatic Item Generation Context . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 4(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1608-040101

Jun, Z., Dongming, O., Shuyuan, X., Haiqi, D., & Shuqing, Q.. (2005). [Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.

Schwall, A., & Sinar, E.. (2011). Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Verschoor, A. (2011). Optimal Calibration Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2007). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

van der Linden, W. J., Veldkamp, B. P., & Reese, L. M.. (2000). An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N.. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J.. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.

McLeod, L., Lewis, C., & Thissen, D.. (2003). A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 121-137.

Meijer, R. R. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H.. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

McLeod, L., Lewis, C., & Thissen, D.. (2003). A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 121-137.

Wise, S. L. (2011). From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Gershon, R. C. (2017). Issues in Trait Range Coverage for Patient Reported Outcome Measure CATs - Extending the Ceiling for Above-average Physical Functioning. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZC02F-dIyYovEjzpeuRdoXDiXMLFRuKb

Meng, H., Steinkamp, S., Jones, P., & Matthews-Lopez, J.. (2011). Practitioner’s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Reeve, B. B., Talcott, J. A., Clark, J. A., et al.. (2005). Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.

Verschoor, A. (2017). Grow a Tiger out of Your CAT . In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.

Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. L., & Hahn, J. A.. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

Gardner, W., Shear, K., Kelleher, K. J., Pajer, K. A., Mammen, O., Buysse, D., & Frank, E.. (2004). Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study. BMC Psychiatry, 4, 13-23.

Kopec, J. A., Badii, M., McKenna, M., Lima, V. D., Sayre, E. C., & Dvorak, M.. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine, 33, 1384-90. presented at the May 20.

Ray, R. D. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In R. W. Malott, Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Chakravarty, E. F., Bjorner, J. B., & Fries, J. F.. (2007). Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.

Kreiter, C. D., Ferguson, K., & Gruppen, L. D.. (1999). Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74, 1125-8. presented at the Oct.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T.. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Rammsayer, T., & Brandler, S.. (2003). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.

Ray, R. D. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In R. W. Malott, Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Thompson, N. (2017). Developing a CAT: An Integrated Perspective. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Jv8bpH2zkw5TqSMi03e5JJJ98QtXf-Cv

Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T.. (2017). From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ

Edmonds, J., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). A mixed integer programming model for multiple stage adaptive testing. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 342-350.

Ray, R. D. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In R. W. Malott, Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Wang, C., Weiss, D. J., Zhang, X., Tao, J., He, Y., Chen, P., et al.. (2017). New Challenges (With Solutions) and Innovative Applications of CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wvgxw7in_QCq_F7kzID6zCZuVXWcFDPa

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al.. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D.. (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2008). Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D.. (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Ludlow, L. H., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2006). Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1223-9. presented at the Sep.

Haley, S. M., Raczek, A. E., Coster, W. J., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2005). Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.

Mulcahey, M. J., Haley, S. M., Duffy, T., Pengsheng, N., & Betz, R. R.. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.

Chandra, I. (2017). Item Selection Strategies for Developing CAT in Indonesia. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata Japan: Niiagata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KuFrRATq9Q

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.