Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Hambleton, R. K., Montpetit, K., et al.. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.

McBride, J. R., & Tardrew, S. P.. (2002). Mapping the Development of Pre-reading Skills with STAR Early Literacy. In Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. Chicago.

Traub, R. E., & Lam, Y. R.. (1985). Latent structure and item sampling models for testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 19-48.

Thompson, N. A. (2011). JATT Special Issue on Adaptive Testing: Welcome and Overview. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. presented at the 05/2011. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Thomas, T. J., & Green, B. F.. (1989). Item-presentation controls for computerized adaptive testing: Content-balancing versus min-CAT (Research Report 89-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Laboratory.

Paap, M. C. S., Kroeze, K. A., Terwee, C. B., van der Palen, J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2017). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3

Tu, D., Han, Y., Cai, Y., & Gao, X.. (2018). Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 677-694. doi:10.1177/0146621618762748

Thompson, N. A. (2009). Item Selection in Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 778-793. doi:10.1177/0013164408324460

Thompson, N. A. (2007). Item selection in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the Conference on High Stakes Testing. University of Nebraska.

Thompson, N. A. (2009). Item selection in computerized classification testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 778-793.

Thissen, D., Nelson, L. A., & Swygert, K. A.. (2001). Item response theory applied to combinations of multiple-choice and constructed-response items--approximation methods for scale scores. In Test scoring (pp. 289-315). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cook, K. F., Teal, C. R., Bjorner, J. B., Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Crane, P. K., et al.. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121-132.

Cook, K. F., Teal, C. R., Bjorner, J. B., Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Crane, P. K., et al.. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121-132.

Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu, Y.. (2002). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu.,. (2001). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in a realistic second-order equitable CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Thompson, T., & Way, W. D.. (2007). Investigating CAT designs to achieve comparability with a paper test. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Elhan, A. H., Oztuna, D., Kutlay, S., Kucukdeveci, A. A., & Tennant, A.. (2008). An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Implications from information functions and standard errors for determining preferred normed scales for CAT and P and P ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

O'Neill, T., Lunz, M. E., & Thiede, K.. (2000). The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 131-151.

Reckase, M. D., Thompson, T. D., & Nering, M.. (1997). Identifying similar item content clusters on multiple test forms. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg, TN, June.

Nering, M. L., Davey, T., & Thompson, T.. (1998). A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Nering, M. L., Davey, T., & Thompson, T.. (1998). A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Tai, M. Him, Cooperman, A. W., DeWeese, J. N., & Weiss, D. J.. (2023). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032

Talento-Miller, E., & Guo, F.. (2009). Guess what? Score differences with rapid replies versus omissions on a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Thomasson, G. L. (1997). The goal of equity within and between computerized adaptive tests and paper and pencil forms. . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Thompson, N. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (2011). A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 16.

Edwards, M. C., & Thissen, D.. (2007). Exploring potential designs for multi-form structure computerized adaptive tests with uniform item exposure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2006). Evaluation parameters for computer adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37(No 2), 261-278.

Thompson, N., & Stoeger, J.. (2017). Evaluation of Parameter Recovery, Drift, and DIF with CAT Data. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F7HCZWD28Q97sCKFIJB0Yps0H66NPeKq

French, B. F., & Thompson, T. T.. (2003). The evaluation of exposure control procedures for an operational CAT. . In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Archer, R. P., Tirrell, C. A., & Elkins, D. E.. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.

Thomasson, G. L. (2003). Evaluating stability of online item calibrations under varying conditions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Thompson, T. (2002). Employing new ideas in CAT to a simulated reading test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Chang, S. - W., & Twu, B. - Y.. (2001). Effects of changes in the examinees’ ability distribution on the exposure control methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Zwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Wingersky, M.. (1995). Effect of Rasch calibration on ability and DIF estimation in computer-adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 341-363.

Passos, V. L., Berger, M. P. F., & Tan, F. E. S.. (2008). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.

Zwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Wingersky, M.. (1994). DIF analysis for pretest items in computer-adaptive testing (Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 94-33). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Tatsuoka, K. K., & Tatsuoka, M. M.. (1997). Diagnostic adaptive testing: Effects of remedial instruction as empirical validation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 3-20.

Tatsuoka, K. K., & Tatsuoka, M. M.. (1997). Diagnostic adaptive testing: Effects of remedial instruction as empirical validation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 3-20.

Flens, G., Smits, N., Terwee, C. B., Dekker, J., Huijbrechts, I., Spinhoven, P., & de Beurs, E.. (In Press). Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test for Anxiety Based on the Dutch–Flemish Version of the PROMIS Item Bank. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191117746742

Zickar, M. J., Overton, R. C., Taylor, L. R., & Harms, H. J.. (1999). The development of a computerized adaptive selection system for computer programmers in a financial services company. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olsen (Eds.), Innvoations in computerized assessment (p. 7-33). Mahwah NJ Erlbaum.

Flens, G., Smits, N., Terwee, C. B., Dekker, J., Huijbrechts, I., & de Beurs, E.. (2017). Development of a Computer Adaptive Test for Depression Based on the Dutch-Flemish Version of the PROMIS Item Bank. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 40, 79-105. doi:10.1177/0163278716684168

de la Torre Sanchez, R. (1992). The development and evaluation of a system for computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 4304.

Thissen, D. (2002). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. In Paper presented at the conference “Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement. ” Bethesda, Maryland, June 23-25.

Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. - H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B.. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 95-108.

Dennis, M. L., Funk, R., Titus, J., Riley, B. B., Hosman, S., & Kinne, S.. (2008). Developing a progressive approach to using the GAIN in order to reduce the duration and cost of assessment with the GAIN short screener, Quick and computer adaptive testing. In Joint Meeting on Adolescent Treatment Effectiveness . presented at the 2008, Washington D.C., USA.

Thompson, N. (2017). Developing a CAT: An Integrated Perspective. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Jv8bpH2zkw5TqSMi03e5JJJ98QtXf-Cv

Jacobsen, J., Ackermann, R., Egüez, J., Ganguli, D., Rickard, P., & Taylor, L.. (2011). Design of a Computer-Adaptive Test to Measure English Literacy and Numeracy in the Singapore Workforce: Considerations, Benefits, and Implications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2007). The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 49.

Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Reeve, B. B., Talcott, J. A., Clark, J. A., et al.. (2005). Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.

Tatsuoka, K., & Birenbaum, M.. (1979). The danger of relying solely on diagnostic adaptive testing when prior and subsequent instructional methods are different (CERL Report E-5). Urbana IL: Univeristy of Illinois, Computer-Based Education Research Laboratory.

Ro, S., & Thompson, N. A.. (2007). Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.

Thompson, J. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Vispoel, W. T., & Twing, J. S.. (1990). Creating adaptive tests of musical ability with limited-size item pools. In . D. Dalton (Ed.), ADCIS 32nd International Conference Proceedings (pp. 105-112). Columbus OH: Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems.

Montpetit, K., Haley, S., Bilodeau, N., Ni, P., Tian, F., Gorton, G., 3rd, & Mulcahey, M. J.. (2011). Content range and precision of a computer adaptive test of upper extremity function for children with cerebral palsy. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 31, 90-102.

Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A.. (1960). Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Laros, J. A., & Tellegen, P. J.. (1991). Construction and validation of the SON-R 5-17, the Snijders-Oomen non-verbal intelligence test. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

Thompson, T., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Constructing passage-based tests that parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Thompson, T., Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Constructing adaptive tests to parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.