Export 276 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
. (1993). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, adaptive, and self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEARA. Atlanta GA.
. (1989). Individual differences in item selection in self adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1973). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the National Conference on the Us of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
. (2017). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs
. (2001). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Invited small group session at the 6th Conference of the European Association of Psychological Assessment. Aachen, Germany.
. (2003). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
re03-01.pdf (134.72 KB). (1994). L'évaluation nationale individualisée et assistée par ordinateur [Large scale assessment: Tailored and computerized]. In Québec: Proceeding of the 14th Congress of the Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Montréal: Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (AQPC).
. (2003). Maintaining scale in computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
sm03-01.pdf (366.57 KB). (2003). Methods for item set selection in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
lu03-02.pdf (441.94 KB). (2001). A monte carlo study of the feasibility of on-the-fly assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1979). Operational characteristics of a Rasch model tailored testing procedure when program parameters and item pool attributes are varied. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure des étudiants : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif. In Commnication présentée à l’intérieur de la 23e session d’études de l’Association pour le dévelopement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation. ADMÉÉ.
. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).
. (2002). Practical considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a prior, adaptive corrections for bias, adaptive integration interval. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.
ra02-01.pdf (99.92 KB). (1984). Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2001). Principes et enjeux du testing adaptatif : de la loi des petits nombres à la loi des grands nombres. In Communication présentée à l’intérieur du 69e congrès de l’Association canadienne française pour l’avancement de la science. Acfas.
. (1976). Procedures for computerized testing. In Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the National Conference on the Use of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
. (1984). The selection of items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the national meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1993). A simulated comparison of testlets and a content balancing procedure for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.
. (1993). A simulated comparison of two content balancing and maximum information item selection procedures for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.
. (1997). A simulation study of the use of the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures for assessing DIF in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2002). Some features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Communication proposée au 11e Biannual International objective measurement workshop. New-Orleans : International Objective Measurement Workshops.
bl02-01.pdf (37.17 KB). (2002). Some features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.
. (2011). A Test Assembly Model for MST. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Verschoor Radtke Eggen Test Assmebly Model.pdf (339.24 KB). (2000). Test security and the development of computerized tests. In Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education invited symposium: Maintaining test security in computerized programs–Implications for practice. New Orleans.
. (1996). A Type I error rate study of a modified SIBTEST DIF procedure with potential application to computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Alberta Canada.
. (2002). Updated item parameter estimates using sparse CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
sm02-02.pdf (985.84 KB). (2002). Updated item parameter estimates using sparse CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
sm02-02.pdf (985.84 KB). (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB). (1997). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.
. (2007). Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admissions Council.
. (2007). The use of computerized adaptive testing to assess psychopathology using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs. American Evaluation Association. presented at the November, Portland, OR USA: American Evaluation Association .
. (1990). Adaptive designs for Likert-type data: An approach for implementing marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 304-321.
. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.
. (1994). ADTEST: A computer-adaptive tests based on the maximum information principle. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 680-686.
. (2000). Algoritmo mixto mínima entropía-máxima información para la selección de ítems en un test adaptativo informatizado. Psicothema, 12, 12-14.
. (1977). Application of tailored testing to achievement measurement. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 158-161.
. (2005). Assessing Mobility in Children Using a Computer Adaptive Testing Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-939.
. (2005). Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.
. (2002). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.
. (2004). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
. (2007). A “Rearrangement Procedure†For Scoring Adaptive Tests with Review Options. International Journal of Testing, 7, 387-407. doi:10.1080/15305050701632262
. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (2011). catR: An R Package for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621611407482
. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.
. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.
. (2010). A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802
. (2010). A comparison of content-balancing procedures for estimating multiple clinical domains in computerized adaptive testing: Relative precision, validity, and detection of persons with misfitting responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423.
. (1998). A comparison of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 311-327.
. (1992). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.
. (1996). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using a computerized test. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 21, 405-414.
. (2012). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124
. (2011). Computer adaptive testing for small scale programs and instructional systems. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
. (1980). Computer applications to ability testing. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 13, 193-203.
. (1990). Computer testing: Pragmatic issues and research needs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9 (2), 19-20.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.