Fan, M., & Hsu, Y.. (1996). Utility of Fisher information, global information and different starting abilities in mini CAT. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Peterson, K. A., L., D. M., & Hjelseth, L.. (2005). Computerizing statewide assessments in Minnesota: A report on the feasibility of converting the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments to a computerized adaptive format. Office of Educational Accountability, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al.. (2004). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Overton, R. C., Harms, H. J., Taylor, L. R., & Zickar, M. J.. (1997). Adapting to adaptive testing. Personnel Psychology, 50, 171-185.

Henly, S. J., Klebe, K. J., McBride, J. R., & Cudeck, R.. (1989). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 363-371.

Henly, S. J., Klebe, K. J., McBride, J. R., & Cudeck, R.. (1989). Adaptive and Conventional Versions of the DAT: The First Complete Test Battery Comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(4), 363-371.

Singh, J., Howell, R. D., & Rhoads, G. K.. (1990). Adaptive designs for Likert-type data: An approach for implementing marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 304-321.

Jette, A. M., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., & Moed, R.. (2008). Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 842-52. presented at the Oct.

Häusler, J.. (2006). Adaptive success control in computerized adaptive testing. Psychology Science, 48, 436-450.

Huang, Y. - M., Lin, Y. - T., & Cheng, S. - C.. (2009). An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers and Education, 52, 53-67.

Hung, P. - H. (1989). Application of computerized adaptive testing to the University Entrance Exam of Taiwan, R.O.C. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3662.

Unick, G. J., Shumway, M., & Hargreaves, W.. (2008). Are we ready for computerized adaptive testing?. Psychiatric Services, 59, 369. presented at the Apr.

Haley, S. M., Raczek, A. E., Coster, W. J., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2005). Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.

Haley, S., Raczek, A., Coster, W., Dumas, H., & Fragalapinkham, M.. (2005). Assessing Mobility in Children Using a Computer Adaptive Testing Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-939.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2008). Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27.

Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2004). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.

Breithaupt, K., & Hare, D. R.. (2007). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multistage Testlets for a High-Stakes Licensing Examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0013164406288162

Hornke, L. F. (1999). Benefits from computerized adaptive testing as seen in simulation studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 91-98.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T., Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D.. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.

Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2000). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.

Hutt, M. L. (1947). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.

Shudong Wang,, Hong Jiao,, Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J.. (2008). Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24. doi:10.1177/0013164407305592

Ban, J. C., Hanson, B. A., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.

Ban, J. C., Hanson, B. A., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.

Hai-qi, D., De-zhi, C., Shuliang, D., & Taiping, D.. (2006). The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.

Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J.. (2012). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903

Harris, J. D., & Smith, P. F.. (1979). A comparison of a standard and a computerized adaptive paradigm in Bekesy fixed-frequency audiometry. Journal of Auditory Research, 19, 1-22.

Leroux, A. J., Lopez, M., Hembry, I., & Dodd, B. G.. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802

He, W., Diao, Q., & Hauser, C.. (2014). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503

He, W., Diao, Q., & Hauser, C.. (2014). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503

Hetter, R. D., Segall, D. O., & Bloxom, B. M.. (1994). A comparison of item calibration media in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 197-204.

Hetter, R. D., Segall, D. O., & Bloxom, B. M.. (1994). A Comparison of Item Calibration Media in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3).

Chen, S., Hou, L., & Dodd, B. G.. (1998). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.

Hockemeyer, C. (2002). A comparison of non-deterministic procedures for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. Psychologische Beitrge, 44, 495-503.

Jodoin, M. G., Zenisky, A., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2006). Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3

Olson, J. B., Maynes, D. D., Slawson, D., & Ho, K.. (1989). Comparisons of paper-administered, computer-administered and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 311-326.

Andres, P. L., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D.. (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M. D., & Jette, A. M.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.

Haley, S., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M., & Jette, A.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-1182.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M. D., & Jette, A. M.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-82. presented at the Nov.

Haley, S., Ni, P., Hambleton, R. K., Slavin, M., & Jette, A.. (2006). Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1174-1182.

Spineti, J. P., & Hambleton, R. K.. (1977). A computer simulation study of tailored testing strategies for objective-based instructional programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 139-158.

He, Q., & Tymms, P.. (2005). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.

Kim, D. - H., & Huynh, H.. (2008). Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration Mode Effects on a Statewide End-of-Course English Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 554-570. doi:10.1177/0013164407310132

Reise, S. P., & Henson, J. M.. (2000). Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 7, 347-64.

Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M. E.. (1999). Computerized adaptive assessment with the MMPI-2 in a clinical setting. Psychological Assessment, 11, 369-380.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2, 1-15.

Leung, C. K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. T.. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58, 239-57. presented at the Nov.

Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Sinclair, S. J., Tao, W., et al.. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 275-283. presented at the Feb.

Haley, S. M., Siebens, H., Coster, W. J., Tao, W., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Gandek, B., et al.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1033-42. presented at the Aug.

Hart, D. L., Wang, Y. - C., Stratford, P. W., & Mioduski, J. E.. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for patients with knee inpairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 1113-1124.

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429.

Hol, M. A., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2007). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Motivation Items: Administration Mode Effects and a Comparison With Short Forms. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 412-429. doi:10.1177/0146621606297314

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12

Halkitis, P. N., & Leahy, J. M.. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing: the future is upon us. Nurs Health Care, 14, 378-85. presented at the Sep.

Huang, H. - Y., Chen, P. - H., & Wang, W. - C.. (2012). Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552

Wang, W. - C., & Huang, S. - Y.. (2011). Computerized Classification Testing Under the One-Parameter Logistic Response Model With Ability-Based Guessing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 925-941. doi:10.1177/0013164410392372

Mueller, K., Liebig, C., & Hattrup, K.. (2007). Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 658-678. doi:10.1177/0013164406292084