van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Optimal test assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195-211.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1177/0146621606288890

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). Optimal Testlet Pool Assembly for Multistage Testing Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 204-215. doi:10.1177/0146621605284350

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (In Press). Optimizing cognitive ability measurement with multidimensional computer adaptive testing. International Journal of Testing.

Meijer, R. R. (2002). Outlier detection in high-stakes certification testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 219-233.

Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Teresi, J. A. (2006). Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Medical Care, 44, S39-49. presented at the Nov.

Ponsoda, V. (2000). Overview of the computerized adaptive testing special section. Psicológica, 21, 115-120.

Kim, J., Chung, H., Dodd, B. G., & Park, R.. (2012). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977

Kang, H. - A., & Chang, H. - H.. (2016). Parameter Drift Detection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Informational Distance/Divergence Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 534-550. doi:10.1177/0146621616663676

Tejada, R., & Antonio, J.. (2001). Pasado, presente y futuro de los test adaptativos informatizados: Entrevista con Isaac I. Béjar [Past, present and future of computerized adaptive testing: Interview with Isaac I. Béjar]. Psicothema, 13, 685-690.

Chang, C. - H. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Quality of Life Research, 16 Suppl 1, 157-66.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R. C., Cook, K. F., Reeve, B., et al.. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45, S3-S11.

Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D.. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000

Green, B. F., Bock, B. D.,, Linn, R. L., Lord, F. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). A plan for scaling the computerized adaptive Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.

Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B.. (2011). Polytomous Adaptive Classification Testing: Effects of Item Pool Size, Test Termination Criterion, and Number of Cutscores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 1006-1022. doi:10.1177/0013164410393956

Wang, L. - S., & Li., C. - S.. (2001). Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2 (4).

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2009). a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(2).

Wightman, L. F. (1998). Practical issues in computerized test assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 292-302.

Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.

Mills, C. N.,, & Stocking, M. L.. (1996). Practical issues in large-scale computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 287-304.

Thompson, N. A. (2007). A Practitioner’s Guide for Variable-length Computerized Classification Testing. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 1-13.

Wainer, H.,. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.

Wang, S.,, & Wang, T.. (2001). Precision of Warm’s weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 317-331.

Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, S. H.. (2008). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.

Brooks, S., & Hartz, M. A.. (1978). Predictive ability of a branching test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-419.

van der Linden, W. J. (2009). Predictive Control of Speededness in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 25-41. doi:10.1177/0146621607314042

Taherbhai, H. M., & Young, M. J.. (2004). Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 301-18.

Doebler, A. (2012). The Problem of Bias in Person Parameter Estimation in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255-270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304

Chen, S. - Y. (2010). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788

Reckase, M. D. (1977). Procedures for computerized testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 70, 351-356.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.

Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B.. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.

Luo, X., Kim, D., & Dickison, P.. (2017). Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 275 - 290. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617726790

Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D.. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.

Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.

Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas de un test Adaptativo Informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an Emotional Adjustment Computerized Adaptive Test]. Psicothema, 17, 484-491.

Olea., J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Belchi, J.. (1996). Propiedades psicometricas du un test adaptivo informatizado do vocabulario ingles [Psychometric properties of a computerized adaptive tests for the measurement of English vocabulary]. Estudios de Psicologica, 55, 61-73.

Volans, P. J. (1982). Pros and cons of tailored testing: An examination of issues highlighted with an automated testing system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 301-304.

Jette, A.,, Haley, S., Tao, W., Ni, P., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Zurek, M.. (2007). Prospective evaluation of the am-pac-cat in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Physical Therapy, 87, 385-398.

Way, W. D. (1998). Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 17-27.

Wise, S. L., Plake, B. S., & et. al.,. (1989). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.

Powell, Z. E. (1994). The psychological impacts of computerized adaptive testing methods. Educational Technology, 34, 41-47.

Tonidandel, S.,, & Quiñones, M. A.. (2000). Psychological reactions to adaptive testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 7-15.

Revuelta, J., Ximénez, M. C., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and psychological effects of item selection and review on computerized testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808.

Revuelta, J., Ximénez, C. M., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282

Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Ximenez, M. C., & Abad, F. J.. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicolgia, 21, 157-173.

Vispoel, W. P. (1998). Psychometric characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests: The role of answer feedback and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-347 or 155-167.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al.. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.

Rubio, V. J., Aguado, D., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.

Jodoin, M. G. (2003). Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.

Hol, M. A., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2005). A Randomized Experiment to Compare Conventional, Computerized, and Computerized Adaptive Administration of Ordinal Polytomous Attitude Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183. doi:10.1177/0146621604271268

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2005). A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.

Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720

Glas, C. A. W. (1988). The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.

Fobey, J. D., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S.. (2000). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.

Forbey, J. D., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S.. (2000). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1989). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.

Wang, T., Hanson, B. H., & Lau, C. - M. H.. (1999). Reducing bias in CAT trait estimation: A comparison of approaches. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 263-278.