Hetter, R. D., Bloxom, B. M., & Segall, D. O.. (1993). Item Calibration: Medium-of-administration effect on computerized adaptive scores (TR-93-9). Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Bock, B. D.,, Muraki, E., & Pfeiffenberger, W.. (1988). Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 275-285.

Ware, J. E., Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2005). Item response theory in computer adaptive testing: implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 50, 71-78.

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Reeve, B. B., Von Roenn, J., Shervin, D., McGuire, M., et al.. (2005). An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 278-88.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2009). Item selection rules in computerized adaptive testing: Accuracy and security. Methodology, 5, 7-17.

Nandakumar, R., Banks, J. C., & Roussos, L. A.. (2006). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Bulut, O., & Cormier, D.. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc

Binet, A., & Simon, T.. (1908). Le development de lintelligence chez les enfants. LAnee Psychologique, 14, 1-94.

Raîche, G., & Béland, A.. (1994). L'évaluation nationale individualisée et assistée par ordinateur [Large scale assessment: Tailored and computerized]. In Québec: Proceeding of the 14th Congress of the Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Montréal: Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (AQPC).

Vispoel, W. P., Hendrickson, A. B., & Bleiler, T.. (2000). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 21-38.

Vispoel, W. P., Hendrickson, A., Bleiler, T., Widiatmo, H., Shrairi, S., & Ihrig, D.. (1999). Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests: Psychometric and attitudinal results. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Li, X., Becker, K., Gorham, J., & Woo, A.. (2009). Limiting item exposure for target difficulty ranges in a high-stakes CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF File, 1.

Rose, M., & Bezjak, A.. (2009). Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research, 18, 125-36. presented at the Feb.

Bickel, P., Buyske, S., Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2001). On maximizing item information and matching difficulty with ability. Psychometrika, 66, 69-77.

Bickel, P., Buyske, S., Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2001). On maximizing item information and matching difficulty with ability. Psychometrika, 66, 69-77.

Barrada, J. R., Mazuela, P., & Olea, J.. (2006). Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. Psicothema, 18, 156-159. presented at the Feb.

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (In Press). Measurement efficiency for fixed-precision multidimensional computerized adaptive tests: Comparing health measurement and educational testing using example banks. Applied Psychological Measurement.

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (In Press). Measurement efficiency for fixed-precision multidimensional computerized adaptive tests: Comparing health measurement and educational testing using example banks. Applied Psychological Measurement.

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (2019). Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 68-83. doi:10.1177/0146621618765719

Paap, M. C. S., Born, S., & Braeken, J.. (2019). Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 68-83. doi:10.1177/0146621618765719

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Hambleton, R. K., Montpetit, K., et al.. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.

Mulcahey, M. J., Haley, S. M., Duffy, T., Pengsheng, N., & Betz, R. R.. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2010). A Method for the Comparison of Item Selection Rules in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 438-452. doi:10.1177/0146621610370152

Binet, A., & Simon, T.. (1915). A method of measuring the development of the intelligence of young children. Chicago: Chicago Medical Book Co.

Thissen, D., Reeve, B. B., Bjorner, J. B., & Chang, C. - H.. (2007). Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality of Life Research, 16, 109-119, .

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (2007). Methods for restricting maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptative testing. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3, 14-23.

Glas, C. A. W., Wainer, H.,, & Bradlow, E. T.. (2000). MML and EAP estimation in testlet-based adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 271-287). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bartroff, J., Finkelman, M., & Lai, T. L.. (2008). Modern sequential analysis and its application to computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 73, 473-486.

Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A monte carlo approach for adaptive testing with content constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081

Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach for Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081

Belov, D.I., A. R. D. (2008). A Monte Carlo approach to the design, assembly, and evaluation of multistage adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 119–137.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach to the Design, Assembly, and Evaluation of Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 119-137. doi:10.1177/0146621606297308

Revuelta, J., Bejar, I. I., & Stocking, M.. (2001). A monte carlo study of the feasibility of on-the-fly assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2005). Monte Carlo Test Assembly for Item Pool Analysis and Extension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 239-261. doi:10.1177/0146621605275413

Bontempo, B. D. (2011). Moving beyond Efficiency to Allow CAT to Provide Better Diagnostic Information. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Binet, A., & Simon, T. A.. (1905). Mthode nouvelle pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux. L'Anne Psychologique, 11, 191-244.

Weiss, D. J., & Brown, J. M.. (1977). Multi-Content Adaptive Measurement of Achievement. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Bloxom, B. M., & Vale, C. D.. (1987). Multidimensional adaptive testing: A procedure for sequential estimation of the posterior centroid and dispersion of theta. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Montreal, Canada.

Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Fayers, P., Sprangers, M., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2006). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30: basic developments and evaluations. Quality of Life Research, 15, 315-29. presented at the Apr.

Barrada, J. R., Veldkamp, B. P., & Olea, J.. (2006). Multiple maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the SMABS-EAM Conference. Budapest, Hungary.

Barrada, J. R., Veldkamp, B. P., & Olea, J.. (2009). Multiple Maximum Exposure Rates in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 58-73. doi:10.1177/0146621608315329

Newton, D. W., Boyle, M., & Catizone, C. A.. (2008). The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 33. presented at the Apr 15.

Beeman, P. B., & Waterhouse, J. K.. (2001). NCLEX-RN performance: predicting success on the computerized examination. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 158-165. presented at the Jul-Aug.

Kaplan, M., de la Torre, J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2015). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650

Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 32-43. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Stahl, J., Shumway, R., Bergstrom, B., & Fisher, A.. (1997). On-line performance assessment using rating scales. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 1, 173-191.

Bejar, I. I. (1999). On-the-fly adaptive tests: An application of generative modeling to quantitative reasoning. In Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Buyske, S. G. (1999). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 4220.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). Optimal Testlet Pool Assembly for Multistage Testing Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 204-215. doi:10.1177/0146621605284350

Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Desmarais, M. C., Pu, X,, & Blais, J. - G.. (2007). Partial order knowledge structures for CAT applications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R. C., Cook, K. F., Reeve, B., et al.. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45, S3-S11.

Green, B. F., Bock, B. D.,, Linn, R. L., Lord, F. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). A plan for scaling the computerized adaptive Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.

Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B.. (2011). Polytomous Adaptive Classification Testing: Effects of Item Pool Size, Test Termination Criterion, and Number of Cutscores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 1006-1022. doi:10.1177/0013164410393956

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2009). a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(2).

Raîche, G, B. J. G., & Boiteau, N.. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).

Raiche, G., & Blais, J. G.. (2002). Practical considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a prior, adaptive corrections for bias, adaptive integration interval. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.

Brooks, S., & Hartz, M. A.. (1978). Predictive ability of a branching test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-419.

Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B.. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.

Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D.. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.