Export 2294 results:
Journal Article
Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of two-stage testing. Psychometrika, 36, 227-242.
Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of the measurement effectiveness of flexilevel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 805-813.
Luecht, R., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA Examination. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 189-202. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z.. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436. presented at the Sep.
Stone, C. A. (1989). Testing software review: MicroCAT Version 3. . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8 (3), 33-38.
Stricker, L. J.,, & Bejar, I. I.. (2004). Test difficulty and stereotype threat on the GRE General Test. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 563-597.
Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J.. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.
McHorney, C. A. (2003). Ten recommendations for advancing patient-centered outcomes measurement for older persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 403-409. presented at the Sep 2.
Olson, A. (2002). Technology solutions for testing. School Administrator, 4, 20-23.
Veerkamp, W. J. J. (2000). Taylor approximations to logistic IRT models and their use in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 307-343.
Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing, an approximation of stochastic approximation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 707-711.
Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A successful application of latent trait theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 181-196.
McCormick, D., & Cliff, N. A.. (1977). TAILOR-APL: An interactive computer program for individual tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 771-774.
Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., & Kehoe, J.. (1977). TAILOR: A FORTRAN procedure for interactive tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 767-769.
Fujimori, S. (1995). A study of psychologically optimal level of item difficulty. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 65, 446-53. presented at the Feb.
Cudeck, R. (1985). A structural comparison of conventional and adaptive versions of the ASVAB. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 305-322.
Yang, J., Chang, H. - H., Tao, J., & Shi, N.. (2020). Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 346-361. doi:10.1177/0146621619893783
Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x
Shiba, S., Noguchi, H., & Haebra, T.. (1978). A stratified adaptive test of verbal ability. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 229-238.
Lee, Y. - H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. - D.. (2008). A Strategy for Controlling Item Exposure in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 215-232. doi:10.1177/0013164407307007
Boyd, A. M. (2004). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 5835.
PDF icon bo-03-01.pdf (484.09 KB)
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.
Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
Lu, Y., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Statistics for detecting disclosed items in a CAT environment. Metodologia de Las Ciencias del Comportamiento., 5(2).
Feng, X. (2003). Statistical detection and estimation of differential item functioning in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2736.
van der Linden, W. J., & Xiong, X.. (2013). Speededness and Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 418-438. doi:10.3102/1076998612466143
Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Some reliability estimates for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 239-47.
Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Böhnke, J. R.. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1055–1063. presented at the Apr. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1821-8
PDF icon MCAT_commentary.pdf (847.26 KB)
McBride, J. R. (1977). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 121-140.

Pages