Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
M
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1997). Multi-stage CAT with stratified design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
Edwards, M. C., Flora, D. B., & Thissen, D.. (2012). Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing With Uniform Item Exposure. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 118-141. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.660363
Zenisky, A. L., Hambleton, R. K., & Luecht, R. M.. (2010). Multistage Testing: Issues, Designs, and Research. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 355-372). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2006). Multistage Testing: Widely or Narrowly Applicable?. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 257-260. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_6
Urry, V. W. (1977). A Multivariate Model Sampling Procedure and a Method of Multidimensional Tailored Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ur77062.pdf (911.14 KB)
Vispoel, W. P., Coffman, D., & Scriven, D.. (1990). MusicCAT: An adaptive testing program to assess musical ability. In Paper presented at the ADCIS 32nd International Conference. San Diego CA.
Weissman, A. (2007). Mutual Information Item Selection in Adaptive Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 41-58. doi:10.1177/0013164406288164
Weissman, A. (2004). Mutual information item selection in multiple-category classification CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
Wang, C. (2013). Mutual Information Item Selection Method in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Short Test Length. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 1017-1035. doi:10.1177/0013164413498256
N
Newton, D. W., Boyle, M., & Catizone, C. A.. (2008). The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 33. presented at the Apr 15.
Wandall, J. (2011). National Tests in Denmark – CAT as a Pedagogic Tool. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
Beeman, P. B., & Waterhouse, J. K.. (2001). NCLEX-RN performance: predicting success on the computerized examination. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 158-165. presented at the Jul-Aug.
Hendrickson, A. (2007). An NCME instructional module on multistage testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(2), 44-52.
Parshall, C. G., Kromrey, J. D., Harmes, J. C., & Sentovich, C.. (2001). Nearest neighbors, simple strata, and probabilistic parameters: An empirical comparison of methods for item exposure control in CATs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Kandula, S., Ancker, J. S., Kaufman, D. R., Currie, L. M., & Qing, Z. - T.. (2011). A new adaptive testing algorithm for shortening health literacy assessments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(52). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-52
Featherman, C. M., Subhiyah, R. G., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). New algorithms for item selection and exposure and proficiency estimation under 1- and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.
Davey, T., & Parshall, C. G.. (1995). New algorithms for item selection and exposure control with computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
McLeod, L. D., & Lewis, C.. (1998). A new approach for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Chen, S. - Y. (2001). A new approach to simulation studies in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
PDF icon ch01-01.pdf (250.96 KB)
Wang, C., Weiss, D. J., Zhang, X., Tao, J., He, Y., Chen, P., et al.. (2017). New Challenges (With Solutions) and Innovative Applications of CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Wvgxw7in_QCq_F7kzID6zCZuVXWcFDPa
Kuo, B. - C., & Chen, C. - H.. (2017). A New Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing for Simultaneously Diagnosing Skills and Misconceptions. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Wu, I. L. (2001). A new computer algorithm for simultaneous test construction of two-stage and multistage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 180-198.
Jacobson, R. L. (1993). New computer technique seen producing a revolution in testing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 22-23, 26.
Park, J. (2007). A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07park.pdf (247.11 KB)
He, Y., Chen, P., & Li, Y.. (2020). New Efficient and Practicable Adaptive Designs for Calibrating Items Online. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0146621618824854
Thomasson, G. L. (1995). New item exposure control algorithms for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
Kaplan, M., de la Torre, J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2015). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650
Lau, C., & Wang, T.. (2000). A new item selection procedure for mixed item type in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
PDF icon la00-01.pdf (451.53 KB)
Cronbach, L. J. (1966). New light on test strategy from decision theory. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.). Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.
Wang, L. (2004). New methods for CBT item pool evaluation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
PDF icon wa04-02.pdf (1004.92 KB)
von Davier, M., Cho, Y., & Pan, T.. (2017). New Results on Bias in Estimates due to Discontinue Rules in Intelligence Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2010). A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 1-17. presented at the Dec 1.
Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2011). A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 37-53. doi:10.1177/0013164410387338
Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 32-43. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon be75-01.pdf (609.99 KB)
Pommerich, M., Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (2009). The nine lives of CAT-ASVAB: Innovations and revelations. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09pommerich.pdf (168.32 KB)
De Ayals, R. J. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.
PDF icon v16n4p327.pdf (1.45 MB)
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.
DeMars, C. E. (2022). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008
Yi, Q,, & Nering, M.. (1998). Nonmodel-fitting responses and robust ability estimation in a realistic CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2019). Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 543-561. doi:10.1177/0146621618813113
Samejima, F. (2007). Nonparametric online item calibration. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. .
PDF icon cat07samejima.pdf (1.83 MB)
Cox, M. A. A. (2014). A Numerical Investigation of the Recovery of Point Patterns With Minimal Information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 329-335. doi:10.1177/0146621613516186
O
Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2009). Obtaining reliable diagnostic information through constrained CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09douglas.pdf (251.38 KB)
Guo, F., & Wang, G.. (2003). Online calibration and scale stability of a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon gu03-01.pdf (329.94 KB)
Zheng, Y. (2016). Online Calibration of Polytomous Items Under the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 434-450. doi:10.1177/0146621616650406
Guo, F., Stone, E., & Cruz, D.. (2001). On-line Calibration Using PARSCALE Item Specific Prior Method: Changing Test Population and Sample Size. In Paper presented at National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Meeting. Seattle, Washington.
Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2015). Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 5-15. doi:10.1177/0146621613513065
PDF icon ha01-01.pdf (405.35 KB)
Stahl, J., Shumway, R., Bergstrom, B., & Fisher, A.. (1997). On-line performance assessment using rating scales. Journal of Outcomes Measurement, 1, 173-191.
Bejar, I. I. (1999). On-the-fly adaptive tests: An application of generative modeling to quantitative reasoning. In Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Pages