Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
T
Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
PDF icon Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
PDF icon Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)
Eggen, T. (2010). Three-Category Adaptive Classification Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 373-387). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
Deng, H., & Ansley, T.. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon de03-01.pdf (185.22 KB)
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2002). To weight or not to weight – balancing influence of initial and later items in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ch02-01.pdf (251.46 KB)
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7
Luo, X., & Kim, D.. (2018). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174
Wainer, H.,, & Lewis, C.. (1990). Toward a psychometrics for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 1-14.
Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Trait Parameter Recovery Using Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in Reading and Mathematics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 3-25. doi:10.1177/0146621604270667
Walter, O. B., & Holling, H.. (2008). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
PDF icon Transitioning from Fixed-Length Questionnaires to Computer-Adaptive Versions.pdf (214.47 KB)
Stocking, M. L. (1987). Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36, 263-277.
Ying Cheng,, Chang, H. - H., & Qing Yi,. (2007). Two-Phase Item Selection Procedure for Flexible Content Balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 467-482. doi:10.1177/0146621606292933
de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1977). A two-stage testing procedure (Memorandum 403-77). University of Leyden, The Netherlands, Educational Research Center.
Roussos, L. (1996). A Type I error rate study of a modified SIBTEST DIF procedure with potential application to computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Alberta Canada.
U
Laurier, M. (1993). Un test adaptatif en langue seconde : la perception des apprenants. In . R.Hivon (Éd.),L’évaluation des apprentissages. Sherbrooke : Éditions du CRP.
Veldkamp, B. P., Matteucci, M., & de Jong, M. G.. (2013). Uncertainties in the Item Parameter Estimates and Robust Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 123-139. doi:10.1177/0146621612469825
Chang, H. - H. (2004). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In . D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117-133). New York: Sage.
Wise, S. L. (1994). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.
McDonald, R. P. (1985). Unidimensional and multidimensional models for item response theory. Proceedings of the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. presented at the 06/1982, Minneapolis, MN. USA: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometrics Methods Program.
Sheng, Y., Flournoy, N., & Osterlind, S. J.. (2007). Up-and-down procedures for approximating optimal designs using person-response functions. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07sheng.pdf (1.02 MB)
Smith, R. L., Rizavi, S., Paez, R., & Rotou, O.. (2002). Updated item parameter estimates using sparse CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon sm02-02.pdf (985.84 KB)
De Beer, M. (2007). Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat2007debeer.pdf (133.49 KB)
Conrad, K. J., Riley, B. B., & Dennis, M. L.. (2007). The use of computerized adaptive testing to assess psychopathology using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs. American Evaluation Association. presented at the November, Portland, OR USA: American Evaluation Association .
Anderson, D. (1999). Use of conditional item exposure methodology for an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Riley, B. B., Funk, R., Dennis, M. L., Lennox, R. D., & Finkelman, M.. (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB)
Carey, P. A. (1999). The use of linear-on-the-fly testing for TOEFL Reading. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2005). The use of person-fit statistics in computerized adaptive testing. LSAC Research Report Series. presented at the September, 2005, Newton, PA. USA: Law School Administration Council.
Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Use of Sequential Testing to Prescreen Prospective Entrants to Military Service. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we82-02.pdf (437.88 KB)
Foong, Y. - Y., & Lam, T. - L.. (1991). The use of the graded response model in computerized adaptive testing of the attitudes to science scale. In annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. presented at the April 3-7, 1991, Chicago, IL USA.
Samejima, F. (1977). A Use of the Information Function in Tailored Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 233-247.
PDF icon v01n2p233.pdf (893 KB)
Ackerman, T. A. (1987). The use of unidimensional item parameter estimates of multidimensional items in adaptive testing (No. 87-13). ACT Research Reports (p. 33). presented at the September, 1987, Iowa City, IA: ACT.
PDF icon v15n1p013.pdf (1.06 MB)
PDF icon wa01-06.pdf (2.29 MB)
De Champlain, A. F. (2017). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h
Lai, H., Alves, C., & Gierl, M. J.. (2009). Using automatic item generation to address item demands for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09lai.pdf (319.89 KB)
Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H.. (2018). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788

Pages