Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
R
PDF icon v08n2p155.pdf (594.04 KB)
Hansen, D. N. (1976). Reflections on adaptive testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 90-94). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon ha75-01.pdf (463.75 KB)
Way, W. D., Swanson, l,, & Stocking, M.. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Pine, S. M. (1977). Reduction of Test Bias by Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon pi77128.pdf (734.76 KB)
Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1985). Reducing the predictability of adaptive item sequences. In . Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, 43-48.
Holmes, R. M., & Segall, D. O.. (1999). Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.
Chang, S. - W., & Harris, D. J.. (2002). Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ch02-02.pdf (1.09 MB)
Ying, Z., & Chang, H. - H.. (1995). Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential designs, and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Eleventh Workshop on Item Response Theory. University of Twente, the Netherlands.
Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). Recent and projected developments in ability testing by computer. In . Earl Jones (Ed.), Symposium Proceedings: Occupational Research and the Navy–Prospectus 1980 (TR-74-14). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Harmes, J. C., Parshall, C. G., & Kromrey, J. D.. (2003). Recalibration of IRT item parameters in CAT: Sparse data matrices and missing data treatments. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ha03-01.pdf (625.24 KB)
Papanastasiou, E. C. (2002). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon pa02-01.pdf (409.97 KB)
Davey, T., Nering, M., & Thompson, T.. (1997). Realistic simulation procedures for item response data. In In T. Miller (Chair), High-dimensional simulation of item response data for CAT research. Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
Slutske, W. S., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A real-data simulation of adaptive MMPI administration. In Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI. St. Petersburg FL.
Killcross, M. C. (1977). Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
Wise, S. L. (1999). The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Kubinger, K. D. (1988). On a Rasch-model-based test for non-computerized adaptive testing. In . Langeheine, R. and Rost, J. (Ed.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum Press.
Kunce, C. S. (1979). The Rasch model in computerized personality testing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1979.
Glas, C. A. W. (1988). The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.
de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1988). The Rasch model and missing data, with an emphasis on tailoring test items. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April 5-9, New Orleans, LA. USA.
Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (1977). A rapid item search procedure for Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 77-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon va77-04.pdf (855.87 KB)
Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720
Q
Guo, F. (2009). Quantifying the impact of compromised items in CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09guo.pdf (310.61 KB)
Glas, C. A. W. (1998). Quality control of on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
P
Jodoin, M. G. (2003). Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.
Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Bloxom, B. M., & Hetter, R. D.. (1997). Psychometric procedures for administering CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 131-140). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Bayroff, A. G. (1969). Psychometric problems with branching tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
Hadidi, A., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Psychometric mode effects and fit issues with respect to item difficulty estimates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Revuelta, J., Ximénez, C. M., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
Tonidandel, S.,, & Quiñones, M. A.. (2000). Psychological reactions to adaptive testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 7-15.
Betz, N. E., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Psychological effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Report 76-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon be76-04.pdf (2.36 MB)
Way, W. D. (1997). Protecting the integrity of the CAT item pool. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Way, W. D. (1998). Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 17-27.
Cizek, G. J. (2004). Protecting the integrity of computer-adaptive licensure tests: Results of a legal challenge. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
PDF icon ci04-01.pdf (190.38 KB)

Pages