Manual for CATSim: Comprehensive simulation of computerized adaptive testing. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
. (2010). CATSIM Manual.pdf (1.49 MB)Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1979). gi79-06.pdf (2.72 MB)A word knowledge item pool for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-2). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1974). mcb74-02.pdf (3.78 MB)A validity comparison of adaptive and conventional strategies for mastery testing (Research Report 81-3). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1981). ki81-03.pdf (1.81 MB)A study of computer-administered stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1975). va75-04.pdf (2.62 MB)The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). The stratified adaptive computerized ability test (Research Report 73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1973). we73-3.pdf (2.44 MB)Strategies of adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1974). we74-05.pdf (5.42 MB)Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Report 76-1). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1976). mcb76-02.pdf (1.86 MB)A simulation study of stradaptive ability testing (Research Report 75-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1975). va75-06.pdf (3.2 MB)Simulation studies of two-stage ability testing (Research Report 74-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1974). be74-4.pdf (2.85 MB)Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). ma83-01.pdf (2.72 MB)Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military recruit population (Research Report 83-1). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). ma83-01_0.pdf (2.72 MB)Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests (TR 83-27). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1983). A rapid item search procedure for Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 77-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). va77-04.pdf (855.87 KB)Psychological effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Report 76-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1976). be76-04.pdf (2.36 MB)Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.
. (1982). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). be77-07.pdf (1.97 MB)Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1981). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1983). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1981). ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB)An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing (Research Report 73-4). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1973). be73-04.pdf (2.45 MB)An empirical investigation of computer-administered pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 74-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1974). la74-03.pdf (2.97 MB)An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal ability testing (Research Report 75-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1975). la75-01.pdf (1.73 MB)Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing (Research Report 75-3). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1975). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Report 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1976). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1980). pi79-02.pdf (2.27 MB)Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). th80-03.pdf (2.64 MB)A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1978). be78-04.pdf (1.81 MB)A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1974). de74-1.pdf (2.67 MB)A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1978). pi78-01.pdf (1.91 MB)A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ki80-04.pdf (1.86 MB)Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). be77-05.pdf (1.81 MB)Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 83-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). we83-02.pdf (1.04 MB)Applications of computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1977). we77-01.pdf (3.15 MB)An alternate-forms reliability and concurrent validity comparison of Bayesian adaptive and conventional ability tests (Research Report 80-5). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ki80-05.pdf (1.09 MB)Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1979). ki79-05.pdf (2.1 MB)An adaptive testing strategy for achievement test batteries (Research Rep No 77-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). br77-6.pdf (2.35 MB)Ability measurement: Conventional or adaptive? (Research Report 73-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1973). we73-01.pdf (4.69 MB)Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.
. (2008). gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)Termination Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Tests: Do Variable-Length CATs Provide Efficient and Effective Measurement?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(1), 1-18. doi:10.7333/1212-0101001
. (2012). The stratified adaptive ability test as a tool for personnel selection and placement. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 8, 135-151.
. (1978). Relationship Between Corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 155-163.
. (1984). v08n2p155.pdf (594.04 KB)Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.
. (1984). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.
. (2007). Measuring Individual Growth With Conventional and Adaptive Tests. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 2(1), 80-101.
. (2011). Measuring Individual Change -- JMM.PDF (934.54 KB)Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844
. (2010). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473-492.
. (1982). v06n4p473.pdf (2.74 MB)Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.
. (1976). A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 16.
. (2011). Thompson-Weissv16n1.pdf (191.79 KB)Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 70-84.
. (2004). we04070.pdf (229.1 KB) . (1975).
Bias and Information of Bayesian Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(3), 273-285.
. (1984). v08n3p273.pdf (829.07 KB) . (1984).
Better Data From Better Measurements Using Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, Vol. 2(No. 1), 1-27.
. (2011). Weiss(2011)_CAT.pdf (417.85 KB) . (1985).
. (1987).