Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
E
Rudner, L. M. (2009). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09rudner.pdf (202.22 KB)
Rudner, L. M. (2002). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
PDF icon ru02-01.pdf (45.1 KB)
Davis, L. L., Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., Chiang, C., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2000). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Bowles, R., & Pommerich, M.. (2001). An examination of item review on a CAT using the specific information item selection algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
PDF icon bo01-01.pdf (324.67 KB)
Bowles, R. (2001). An examination of item review on computer adaptive tests. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia.
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2001). An examination of item selection rules by stratified CAT designs integrated with content balancing methods. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
PDF icon le01-01.pdf (295.52 KB)
Swygert, K. (1998). An examination of item-level response times from an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Urbana IL.
PDF icon daxx-01.pdf (652.37 KB)
Buck, D. E. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
Wise, S. L. (1997). Examinee issues in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Expected losses for individuals in Computerized Mastery Testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
Potenza, M. (1994). The exploration of an alternative method for scoring computer adaptive tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska.
Dai, B., Zhang, M., & Li, G.. (2016). Exploration of Item Selection in Dual-Purpose Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing: Based on the RRUM. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 625-640. doi:10.1177/0146621616666008
Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.
Bayroff, A. G., & Seeley, L. C.. (1967). An exploratory study of branching tests (Technical Research Note 188). Washington DC: US Army Behavioral Science Research Laboratory. (NTIS No. AD 655263).
Cleary, T. A., Linn, R. L., & Rock, D. A.. (1969). An exploratory study of programmed tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 345-360.
Edwards, M. C., & Thissen, D.. (2007). Exploring potential designs for multi-form structure computerized adaptive tests with uniform item exposure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07edwards.pdf (211.05 KB)
Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
Luecht, R. M. (2003). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Luecht, R. M. (2003). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL. USA.
PDF icon lu03-04.pdf (115.22 KB)
Frick, T. W., Plew, G. T., & Luk, H. - K.. (1989). EXSPRT: An expert systems approach to computer-based adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Vol. San Francisco.).
Levy, R., Behrens, J. T., & Mislevy, R. J.. (2023). An Extended Taxonomy of Variants of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(1). doi:10.7333/2302-100101
F
Maurelli, V. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). Factors influencing the psychometric characteristics of an adaptive testing strategy for test batteries (Research Rep. No. 81-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ma81-04.pdf (1.65 MB)
Gallagher, A., Bridgeman, B., & Calahan, C.. (1999). Fairness in computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F.. (2002). Fairness issues in adaptive tests with strict time limits. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon br02-01.pdf (1.26 MB)
Gershon, R. C. (2017). FastCAT – Customizing CAT Administration Rules to Increase Response Efficiency. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oPJV-x0p9hRmgJ7t6k-MCC1nAoBSFM1w
PDF icon be03-03.pdf (436.24 KB)
Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.
PDF icon be02-01.pdf (192.6 KB)
Imai, S., Ito, S., Nakamura, Y., Kikuchi, K., Akagi, Y., Nakasono, H., et al.. (2009). Features of J-CAT (Japanese Computerized Adaptive Test). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09imai.pdf (654.11 KB)
Weissman, A. (2006). A Feedback Control Strategy for Enhancing Item Selection Efficiency in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 84-99. doi:10.1177/0146621605282774
Luecht, R. M. (1994). A few more issues to consider in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Coyle, J. (2001). Final answer?. American School Board Journal, 188, 24-26.
Bejar, I. I. (1986). Final report: Adaptive testing of spatial abilities (ONR 150 531). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Weiss, D. J. (1983). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Weiss, D. J. (1981). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Weiss, D. J. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
Weiss, D. J. (1980). Final report: Computerized adaptive performance evaluation. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Pages