The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (1983). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932
. (2012). Stochastic Curtailment of Questionnaires for Three-Level Classification: Shortening the CES-D for Assessing Low, Moderate, and High Risk of Depression. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 22-36. doi:10.1177/0146621615592294
. (2016). Stochastic Curtailment in Adaptive Mastery Testing: Improving the Efficiency of Confidence Interval–Based Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 278-292. doi:10.1177/0146621614561314
. (2015). Statistics for detecting disclosed items in a CAT environment. Metodologia de Las Ciencias del Comportamiento., 5(2).
. (2004). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.
. (1998). Statistical methods for computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
. (1997). Statistical indexes for monitoring item behavior under computer adaptive testing environment. In (Original title: Detecting item misfit in computerized adaptive testing.) Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). zh02-02.pdf (2.23 MB)Statistical detection and estimation of differential item functioning in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2736.
. (2003). Statistical aspects of adaptive testing. In . C. R. Rao and S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 27: Psychometrics) (pp. 801838). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
. (2007). State-of-the-art and adaptive open-closed items in adaptive foreign language assessment. In . Proceedings 4th Hellenic Conference with ternational Participation: Informational and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens,747-756.
. (2004). STAR Reading 2 Computer-Adaptive Reading Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
. (2000). STAR Math 2 Computer-Adaptive Math Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
. (2002). STAR Early Literacy Computer-Adaptive Diagnostic Assessment: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
. (2001). Standard-setting issues in computerized-adaptive testing. In Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education. Halifax, Nova Scotia, May 30th, 2003.
. (2003). Standard errors of proficiency estimates in stratum scored CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). The stability of Rasch pencil and paper item calibrations on computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago IL.
. (1990). Speededness and Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 418-438. doi:10.3102/1076998612466143
. (2013). Specific information item selection for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
. (2000). . (2005).
Some thoughts on controlling item exposure in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07lewis.pdf (356.34 KB)Some test theory for tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1970). Some reliability estimators for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
. (1998). Some reliability estimates for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 239-47.
. (1999). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1055–1063. presented at the Apr. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1821-8
. (2018). MCAT_commentary.pdf (847.26 KB)Some questions that must be addressed to develop and maintain an item pool for use in an adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Some Properties of a Bayesian Adaptive Ability Testing Strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 121-140.
. (1977). v01n1p121.pdf (1.33 MB)Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Report 76-1). Minneapolis MN: Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1976). mcb76-02.pdf (1.86 MB)Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 121-140.
. (1977). Some procedures for computerized ability testing. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 175-187.
. (1989). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing (Internal Report). Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1996). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229-249.
. (1998). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format (Research Report 92-21 or 13?). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1992). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.
. (1993). Some new methods for content balancing adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.
. (1995). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing (Research Rep 94-6). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1994). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.
. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.
. (1997). . (2008). Some New Developments in Adaptive Testing.pdf (544.66 KB)
Some likelihood functions found in tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 79-81). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). lo75-02.pdf (165.27 KB)Some item response theory to provide scale scores based on linear combinations of testlet scores, for computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
. (1998). Some initial experiments with adaptive survey designs for structured questionnaires. In Paper presented at the New Methods and Applications in Consumer Research Conference. Cambridge MA.
. (1993). Some how and which for practical tailored testing. In . L. J. T. van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak and D.N.M. de Gruijter (Eds): Psychometrics for educational debates (pp. 189-206). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Computer-Assisted Instruction, Testing, and Guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1980). Some features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.
. (2002). Some features of the estimated sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. In Communication proposée au 11e Biannual International objective measurement workshop. New-Orleans : International Objective Measurement Workshops.
. (2002). bl02-01.pdf (37.17 KB)Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (1991). Some empirical aspects of the sequential analysis technique as applied to an achievement examination. Journal of Experimental Education, 18, 195-207.
. (1950). Some decision procedures for use with tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 79-100). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). re80-01.pdf (1.12 MB)Some considerations in maintaining adaptive test item pools (Tech Rep. No. ERIC ED391814). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.
. (1988). Some considerations in maintaining adaptive test item pools (Research Report 88-33-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1988). Some considerations for improving accuracy of estimation of item characteristic curves in online calibration of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). Some considerations for eliminating biases in ability estimation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
. (1998). Some Applications of Optimization Algorithms in Test Design and Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10(4), 381-389.
. (1986). v10n4p381.pdf (919.2 KB)Some applications of optimization algorithms in test design and adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 381-389.
. (1986). Some alternatives to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 249-265.
. (2003). Some alternative CAT item selection heuristics (Internal report). Philadelphia PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
. (1995). Solving complex constraints in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, USA.
. (2000). le00-02.pdf (347.05 KB)