Export 480 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is S [Clear All Filters]
Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 271-279.
. (1998). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 271-279.
. (1998). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 96-34). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 96-34). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). Patterns of item exposure using a randomized CAT algorithm. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000
. (2013). Pinpointing PRAXIS I CAT characteristics through simulation procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
. (1994). Practical issues in large-scale computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 287-304.
. (1996). Practical issues in large-scale high-stakes computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-23). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1995). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (2001). Practitioner’s Approach to Identify Item Drift in CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011Meng Item Drift.pdf (337.44 KB)Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1984). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.
. (1982). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 53-73). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (2000). Principles of Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 57-76). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). A procedure for scoring incomplete adaptive tests in high stakes testing. Unpublished manuscript. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1988). Psychometric procedures for administering CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 131-140). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). A real-data simulation of adaptive MMPI administration. In Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI. St. Petersburg FL.
. (1988). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.
. (1989). Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.
. (1999). Refinement of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) (Final Report, Contract No MDA203 06-C-0373). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
. (1988). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation (Research Report 01-18). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation (Research Report 01-18). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation (Research Report 01-18). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (2001). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). Relationship of response latency to test design, examinee ability, and item difficulty in computer-based test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Reliability and construct validity of CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 169-179). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). On the Reliability and Validity of a Numerical Reasoning Speed Dimension Derived From Response Times Collected in Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 245-263. doi:10.1177/0013164411408412
. (2012). . (1991).
Reporting differentiated literacy results in PISA by using multidimensional adaptive testing. . In Research on PISA.. Dodrecht: Springer.
. (2013). Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2
. (2017). Response time feedback on computer-administered tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Response time feedback on computer-administered tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). . (2000).
Revising item responses in computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three models (RR-96-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.
. (1997). Robustness of adaptive testing to multidimensionality. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program. {PDF file, 1.
. (1982). we82-01.pdf (1.6 MB)Routing Strategies and Optimizing Design for Multistage Testing in International Large-Scale Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 192-213. doi:10.1111/jedm.12206
. (2019). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Research Report RR-88-28-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Tech Rep. No. ERIC ED389710). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.
. (1988). A search procedure to determine sets of decision points when using testlet-based Bayesian sequential testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1996). The selection of items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1984). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the national meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
. (2000). Sequential analysis: Tests and confidence intervals. New York: Springer-Verlag.
. (1985). A sharing item response theory model for computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 439-460. presented at the Win.
. (2004). Short tailored tests (RB-69-63). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1969). A simulated comparison of testlets and a content balancing procedure for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.
. (1993). A simulated comparison of two content balancing and maximum information item selection procedures for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.
. (1993). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947-956.
. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017
. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 629-38.
. (2005). ha05629.pdf (227.89 KB)Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.
. (1998). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 97-10). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1997). A Simulation Study to Compare Classification Method in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jCL3fPZLgzIdwvEk20D-FliZ15OTUtpr
. (2017).