Jun, Z., Dongming, O., Shuyuan, X., Haiqi, D., & Shuqing, Q.. (2005). [Item characteristic curve equating under graded response models in IRT]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 832-838.

Judd, W. (2011). Small-Sample Shadow Testing. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Jones-Dickson, C., Dorsey, D., Campbell-Warnock, J., & Fields, F.. (1993). Moving in a new direction: Computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Nursing Management, 24, 80, 82. presented at the Jan.

Jones, D. H. (1997). Mathematical programming approaches to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Jones, D., & Weinman, J.. (1973). Computer-based psychological testing. In . A. Elithorn and D. Jones (Eds.), Artificial and human thinking (pp. 83-93). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Johnson, S. H. (1996). Dispelling myths about the new NCLEX exam. Recruitment, Retention, and Restructuring Report, 9, 6-7. presented at the Jan-Feb.

Johnson, M. J. (1979). Student reaction to computerized adaptive testing in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.

Johnson, M. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Parallel forms reliability and measurement accuracy comparison of adaptive and conventional testing strategies. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 16-34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Johnson, J. L., Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S.. (1991). Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.

Jodoin, M. G., Zenisky, A., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2006). Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3

Jodoin, M. G. (2003). Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.

Jodoin, M., Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2002). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Jodoin, M. G. (2002). Reliability and decision accuracy of linear parallel form and multi stage tests with realistic and ideal item pools. In Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Based Testing and the Internet. Winchester, England.

Jodoin, M. (2003). A multidimensional IRT mechanism for better understanding adaptive test behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J.. (2012). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903

Jiao, H., & Lau, A. C.. (2003). The effects of model misfit in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, C. A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.

Jiao, H. (2003). The effects of model specification error in item response theory-based computerized classification test using sequential probability ratio test. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 64, 478.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category decisions in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego CA.

Jhu, Y.-J.,, & Chen, S. - Y.. (2008). Item exposure control in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 793-811.

Jette, A.,, Haley, S., Tao, W., Ni, P., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Zurek, M.. (2007). Prospective evaluation of the am-pac-cat in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Physical Therapy, 87, 385-398.

Jette, A. M., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., & Moed, R.. (2008). Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 842-52. presented at the Oct.

Jette, A. M., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.

Jensema, C. J. (1977). Bayesian tailored testing and the influence of item bank characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 111-120.

Jensema, C. J. (1972). An application of latent trait mental test theory to the Washington Pre-College Testing Battery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Jensema, C. J. (1974). The validity of Bayesian tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 757-756.

Jensema, C. J. (1976). Bayesian tailored testing and the influence of item bank characteristics. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 82-89). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Jensema, C. J. (1974). An application of latent trait mental test theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 29-48.

Jensema, C. J. (1977). Bayesian Tailored Testing and the Influence of Item Bank Characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 111-120.

Jennings, J. A., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2001). An investigation of the impact of items that exhibit mild DIF on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Janczewski, D., & Lowe, P.. (1992). The Language Training Division's computer adaptive reading proficiency test. Provo, UT: Language Training Division, Office of Training and Education.

Jacobusse, G., & Buuren, S.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629-38. presented at the Jun 15.

Jacobson, R. L. (1993). New computer technique seen producing a revolution in testing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 22-23, 26.

Jacobson, R. L. (1995). Shortfall of questions curbs use of computerized graduate exam. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Jacobsen, J., Ackermann, R., Egüez, J., Ganguli, D., Rickard, P., & Taylor, L.. (2011). Design of a Computer-Adaptive Test to Measure English Literacy and Numeracy in the Singapore Workforce: Considerations, Benefits, and Implications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Jacobs-Cassuto, M. S. (2005). A comparison of adaptive mastery testing using testlets with the 3-parameter logistic model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Iwamoto, C. K., Nungester, R. J., & Luecht, R. M.. (1999). Study of methods to detect aberrant response patterns in computerized testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Ito, K., & Segall, D. O.. (2013). A Comparison of Four Methods for Obtaining Information Functions for Scores From Computerized Adaptive Tests With Normally Distributed Item Difficulties and Discriminations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(5), 88-107. doi:10.7333/1312-0105088

Ito, K., & Sykes, R. C.. (1994). The effect of restricting ability distributions in the estimation of item difficulties: Implications for a CAT implementation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.

Ito, K., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D.. (2009). An evaluation of a new procedure for computing information functions for Bayesian scores from computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Ireland, C. M. (1977). An application of the Rasch one-parameter logistic model to individual intelligence testing in a tailored testing environment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37 (9-A), 5766.

Immekus, J. C., Gibbons, R. D., & Rush, J. A.. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and computerized adaptive testing: An application of post-hoc simulation to a diagnostic screening instrument. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Imai, S. (2017). Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Imai, S., Ito, S., Nakamura, Y., Kikuchi, K., Akagi, Y., Nakasono, H., et al.. (2009). Features of J-CAT (Japanese Computerized Adaptive Test). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Hutt, M. L. (1947). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.

HUnter, D. R. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.

Hung, P. - H. (1989). Application of computerized adaptive testing to the University Entrance Exam of Taiwan, R.O.C. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3662.

Huitzing, H. A. (2004). Using Set Covering with Item Sampling to Analyze the Infeasibility of Linear Programming Test Assembly Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 355-375. doi:10.1177/0146621604266152

Huitzing, H. A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.

Huisman, J. M. E. (1999). Item nonresponse: Occurrence, causes and imputation of missing answers to test items. (M and T Series No 32). Leiden: DSWO Press.

Huh, S. (2008). Preparing the implementation of computerized adaptive testing for high-stakes examinations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.

Huff, K. L., & Sireci, S. G.. (2001). Validity issues in computer-based testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 16-25.

Huebner, A. R., & Finkelman, M. D.. (2016). On Computing the Key Probability in the Stochastically Curtailed Sequential Probability Ratio Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 142-156. doi:10.1177/0146621615611633

Huebner, A., Finkelman, M. D., & Weissman, A.. (2018). Factors Affecting the Classification Accuracy and Average Length of a Variable-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Test. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1802-060101

Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932

Huebner, A., Wang, B., & Lee, S.. (2009). Practical issues concerning the application of the DINA model to CAT data. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Huebner, A. (2012). Item Overexposure in Computerized Classification Tests Using Sequential Item Selection. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(12).

Huebner, A., Wang, C., Daly, B., & Pinkelman, C.. (2018). A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 523-537. doi:10.1177/0146621618758289

Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932

Hubbard, J. P. (1966). Programmed testing in the examinations of the National Board of Medical Examiners. In . A. Anastasi (Ed.), Testing problems in perspective. Washington DC: American Council on Education.