Wise, S. L., Ponsoda, V., & Olea, J.. (2002). Self-adapted testing: An overview. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 12, 107-122.

Rocklin, T. (1997). Self-adapted testing: Improving performance by modifying tests instead of examinees. Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 10(1), 83-104.

Lord, F. M. (1971). The self-scoring flexilevel test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 147-151.

Wang, C., Fan, Z., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J. A.. (2013). A Semiparametric Model for Jointly Analyzing Response Times and Accuracy in Computerized Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 381-417. doi:10.3102/1076998612461831

Haley, S. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., & Ni, P.. (2006). Sensitivity of a computer adaptive assessment for measuring functional mobility changes in children enrolled in a community fitness programme. Clin Rehabil, 20, 616-622.

Armitage, P. (1950). Sequential analysis with more than two alternative hypotheses, and its relation to discriminant function analysis, 12, 137-144.

Wiberg, M. (2006). Sequential Computerized Mastery Tests—Three Simulation Studies. International Journal of Testing, 6, 41-55. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0601_3

Chang, I. Y. (2004). Sequential estimation in variable length computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 121, 249-264.

Tutz, G. (1990). Sequential item response models with an ordered response. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 39-55.

Krathwohl, D. R., & Huyser, R. J.. (1956). The sequential item test. American Psychologist, 2, 419.

Nydick, S. W. (2014). The Sequential Probability Ratio Test and Binary Item Response Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 203-230. doi:10.3102/1076998614524824

Zhang, J. (2014). A Sequential Procedure for Detecting Compromised Items in the Item Pool of a CAT System. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 87-104. doi:10.1177/0146621613510062

Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A.. (1972). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 85-95.

Thomas, D. B. (1975). Sequential testing for instructional classification. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction., 1, 92-99.

Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Sequential Testing for Selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(3), 337-351.

Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Sequential testing for selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 337-351.

Qing Yi,, Jinming Zhang,, & Chang, H. - H.. (2008). Severity of Organized Item Theft in Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Simulation Study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 543-558. doi:10.1177/0146621607311336

Segall, D. O. (2004). A sharing item response theory model for computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 439-460. presented at the Win.

Jacobson, R. L. (1995). Shortfall of questions curbs use of computerized graduate exam. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A.. (2004). Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2006). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.

Nisbet, J., Adams, M., & Arthur, J.. (1980). A simple form of tailored testing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 301-303.

Hart, D., Mioduski, J., Werenke, M., & Stratford, P.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947-956.

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., Werneke, M. W., & Stratford, P. W.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.017

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(3), 290-298.

Hart, D. L., Cook, K. F., Mioduski, J. E., Teal, C. R., & Crane, P. K.. (2006). Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 290-8.

Hart, D. L., Mioduski, J. E., & Stratford, P. W.. (2005). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 629-38.

Stocking, M. L., Ward, W. C., & Potenza, M. T.. (1998). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.

de Ayala, R. J., Dodd, B. G., & Koch, W. R.. (1990). A simulation and comparison of flexilevel and Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 227-239.

Zwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Wingersky, M.. (1994). A Simulation Study of Methods for Assessing Differential Item Functioning in Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 121-140.

Swaminathan, H., Hambleton, R. K., Sireci, S. G., Xing, D., & Rizavi, S. M.. (2003). Small sample estimation in dichotomous item response models: Effect of priors based on judgmental information on the accuracy of item parameter estimates. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 27-51.

Patience, W. M. (1990). Software review: MicroCAT Testing System Version 3. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 82-88.

van der Linden, W. J. (2003). Some alternatives to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 249-265.

Theunissen, T. J. J. M. (1986). Some Applications of Optimization Algorithms in Test Design and Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10(4), 381-389.

Theunissen, T. J. J. M. (1986). Some applications of optimization algorithms in test design and adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 381-389.

Moonan, W. J. (1950). Some empirical aspects of the sequential analysis technique as applied to an achievement examination. Journal of Experimental Education, 18, 195-207.

van der Linden, W. J. (2008). Some new developments in adaptive testing technology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 3-11.

Veerkamp, W. J. J.,, & Berger, M. P. F.. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.

Berger, M. P. F.,, & Veerkamp, W. J. J.. (1997). Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 203-226.

Wainer, H.,. (1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12 (1), 15-20.

Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1998). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229-249.

van der Linden, W. J., & Zwarts, M. A.. (1989). Some procedures for computerized ability testing. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 175-187.

McBride, J. R. (1977). Some Properties of a Bayesian Adaptive Ability Testing Strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 121-140.

McBride, J. R. (1977). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 121-140.

Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Böhnke, J. R.. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1055–1063. presented at the Apr. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1821-8

Nicewander, W. A., & Thomasson, G. L.. (1999). Some reliability estimates for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 239-47.

Miceli, R., & Molinengo, G.. (2005). Somministrazione di test computerizzati di tipo adattivo: Un' applicazione del modello di misurazione di Rasch [Administration of computerized and adaptive tests: An application of the Rasch Model]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 12, 131-149.

van der Linden, W. J., & Xiong, X.. (2013). Speededness and Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 418-438. doi:10.3102/1076998612466143

Feng, X. (2003). Statistical detection and estimation of differential item functioning in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2736.

Lu, Y., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Statistics for detecting disclosed items in a CAT environment. Metodologia de Las Ciencias del Comportamiento., 5(2).

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Bartroff, J., & Thompson, N. A.. (2015). Stochastic Curtailment in Adaptive Mastery Testing: Improving the Efficiency of Confidence Interval–Based Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 278-292. doi:10.1177/0146621614561314

Smits, N., Finkelman, M. D., & Kelderman, H.. (2016). Stochastic Curtailment of Questionnaires for Three-Level Classification: Shortening the CES-D for Assessing Low, Moderate, and High Risk of Depression. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 22-36. doi:10.1177/0146621615592294

Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932

Huebner, A., & Li, Z.. (2012). A Stochastic Method for Balancing Item Exposure Rates in Computerized Classification Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 181-188. doi:10.1177/0146621612439932

van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Stochastic order in dichotomous item response models for fixed, adaptive, and multidimensional tests. Psychometrika, 63, 211-226.

Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.

Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2008). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 1-17.

Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185.

Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133

Boyd, A. M. (2004). Strategies for controlling testlet exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 5835.