Export 350 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is L  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
L
Laurier, M. (1993). Les tests adaptatifs en langue seconde. Communication lors de la 16e session d’étude de l’ADMÉÉ à Laval. Montréal: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation.
Waters, B. K., & Lee, G. C.. (1982). Legal and political considerations in large-scale adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the 23rd conference of the Military Testing Association.
Gonçalves, J. P., Aluisio, S. M., de Oliveira, L. H. M., & Oliveira Jr., O. N.. (2004). A Learning Environment for English for Academic Purposes Based on Adaptive Tests and Task-Based Systems. In J. C. Lester, Vicari, R. M., & Paraguaçu, F., Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 3220, pp. 1-11). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_1
Traub, R. E., & Lam, Y. R.. (1985). Latent structure and item sampling models for testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 19-48.
Xu, H., Fang, G., Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z.. (2018). Latent Class Analysis of Recurrent Events in Problem-Solving Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 478-498. doi:10.1177/0146621617748325
Janczewski, D., & Lowe, P.. (1992). The Language Training Division's computer adaptive reading proficiency test. Provo, UT: Language Training Division, Office of Training and Education.
I
Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
Rulison, K. L., & Loken, E.. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (1999). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: improving the a-stratified design with the Sympson-Hetter algorithm. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, CA.
Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2019). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 335-357. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
Lin, C. - J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2018). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 0013164418790634. doi:10.1177/0013164418790634
Lin, C. - J. (2011). Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints for Computerized Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 20-36. doi:10.1177/0013164410387336
Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., He, Y., & Lai, A. M.. (2013). Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038
Stone, G. E., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). Item calibration considerations: A comparison of item calibrations on written and computerized adaptive examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, C. A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
PDF icon ji04-01.pdf (648.87 KB)
Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category decisions in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego CA.
Liu, O. Lydia, Bridgeman, B., Gu, L., Xu, J., & Kong, N.. (2015). Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 1002-1020. doi:10.1177/0013164415573988
Buhr, D. C., & Legg, S. M.. (1989). Investigating the validity of a computerized adaptive test for different examinee groups. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Li, F., Cohen, A., & Shen, L.. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x
Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157
Leung, C. - I., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2001). Integrating stratification and information approaches for multiple constrained CAT. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
PDF icon le01-02.pdf (321.58 KB)
Linacre, J. M. (1995). Individualized testing in the classroom. In . Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Elsevier Science 295-299.
Lord, F. M. (1972). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lord, F. M. (1974). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory. In . D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman.
Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2003). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT’s item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon li03-02.pdf (417.96 KB)
Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Incorporation Of Content Balancing Requirements In Stratification Designs For Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-270. doi:10.1177/0013164403251326
Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1997). Incorporating decision consistency into Bayesian sequential testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.
Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.
Chen, T., Huang, C. - Y., & Liu, C.. (2017). An Imputation Approach to Handling Incomplete Computerized Tests. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vznZeO3nsZZK0k6_oyw5c9ZTP8uyGnXh
Luecht, R. M. (2000). Implementing the computer-adaptive sequential testing (CAST) framework to mass produce high quality computer-adaptive and mastery tests. In Symposium paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1998). The impact of scoring flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Liu, M., Zhu, R., & Guo, F.. (2001). Impact of item location effects on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1999). Impact of flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
H
Wang, S., Lin, H., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2016). Hybrid Computerized Adaptive Testing: From Group Sequential Design to Fully Sequential Design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 45–62. doi:10.1111/jedm.12100
Chuah, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Luecht, R.. (2006). How Big Is Big Enough? Sample Size Requirements for CAST Item Parameter Estimation. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 241-255. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_5
Luecht, R. M., Nungester, R. J., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). Heuristics based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1996). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1996). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
G
Lewy, A., & Doron, R.. (1977). Group tailored tests and some problems of their utlization. In Third international Symposium on Educational testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E.. (1990). Generative adaptive testing with digit span items. San Diego, CA: Testing Systems Department, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. - W., Chen, J. - H., & Liu, T. - C.. (2014). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494
Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. - W., Chen, J. - H., & Liu, T. - C.. (2014). General Test Overlap Control: Improved Algorithm for CAT and CCT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 229-244. doi:10.1177/0146621613513494

Pages