Export 2016 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
Postoperative Care/*rehabilitation
Precision
Maslak, A., & Pozdniakov, S.. (2017). Analysis of CAT Precision Depending on Parameters of the Item Pool. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bwe58kOQRgCSbB8x6OdZTDK4OIm3LQI3/view?usp=drive_web
Pretest Item Calibration
Meng, H., & Han, C.. (2017). Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Primary Health Care/*organization & administration
PDF icon ga02812.pdf (131.16 KB)
Problem Solving
Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
Process monitoring
Bulut, O., & Cormier, D.. (2017). A Large-Scale Progress Monitoring Application with Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uGbCKenRLnqTxImX1fZicR2c7GRV6Udc
Profiles
Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J.. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.
Prospective Studies
Psychological Tests
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G.. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48.
Psychological Tests/*standards/*statistics & numerical data
PDF icon ba09313.pdf (93.66 KB)
psychomagic
Bontempo, B. D. (2011). Moving beyond Efficiency to Allow CAT to Provide Better Diagnostic Information. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Bontempo - CAT for Diagnostic Information.pdf (283 KB)
psychometric model
Revuelta, J. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.
Psychometrics
Drasgow, F. (2002). The work ahead: A psychometric infrastructure for computerized adaptive tests. In M. P. Potenza, Freemer, J. J., & Ward, W. C., Computer-based tests: Building the foundation for future assessment. Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Stahl, J., Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (2000). CAT administration of language placement examinations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 292-302.
Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2004). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
Veldkamp, B. P., van der Linden, W. J., & Ariel, A.. (2002). Mathematical-programming approaches to test item pool design (No. RR 02-09) (pp. 93-108). Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.
Cella, D., & Nowinski, C. J.. (2002). Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, S10-7. presented at the Dec.
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G.. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48.

Pages