Olea Díaz, J., Ponsoda Gil, V., Revuelta Menéndez, J., Hontangas Beltrán, P., & Abad, F. J.. (2001). Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigación en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]. Apuntes de Psicologia, 19, 11-28.

Cleary, T. A., Linn, R. L., & Rock, D. A.. (1968). Reproduction of total test score through the use of sequential programmed tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 183-187.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Jette, A. M., Tao, W., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Ludlow, L. H.. (2009). Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18, 461-71. presented at the May.

Sireci, S. G., Wainer, H.,, & Thissen, D.. (1991). On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237-247.

Davison, M. L., Semmes, R., Huang, L., & Close, C. N.. (2012). On the Reliability and Validity of a Numerical Reasoning Speed Dimension Derived From Response Times Collected in Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 245-263. doi:10.1177/0013164411408412

Riley, B. B., Conrad, K. J., Bezruczko, N., & Dennis, M. L.. (2007). Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: The GAIN Substance Problem Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 48-65.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A.. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S.,, & Nebelsick-Gullett, L. J.. (1994). The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1984). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1984). Relationship Between Corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 155-163.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Bond, T. L., & Ni, P. S.. (2004). Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, I62-172. presented at the Jan.

Chien, T. W., Wu, H. M., Wang, W. - C., Castillo, R. V., & Chou, W.. (2009). Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 39.

Wang, T., Hanson, B. H., & Lau, C. - M. H.. (1999). Reducing bias in CAT trait estimation: A comparison of approaches. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 263-278.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1989). A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.

Forbey, J. D., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S.. (2000). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.

Fobey, J. D., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S.. (2000). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.

Glas, C. A. W. (1988). The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.

Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720

Hol, M. A., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2005). A Randomized Experiment to Compare Conventional, Computerized, and Computerized Adaptive Administration of Ordinal Polytomous Attitude Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183. doi:10.1177/0146621604271268

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2005). A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.

Jodoin, M. G. (2003). Psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs with ideal and constrained item pools. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2978.

Rubio, V. J., Aguado, D., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al.. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.

Vispoel, W. P. (1998). Psychometric characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests: The role of answer feedback and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-347 or 155-167.

Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Ximenez, M. C., & Abad, F. J.. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicolgia, 21, 157-173.

Revuelta, J., Ximénez, M. C., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and psychological effects of item selection and review on computerized testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808.

Revuelta, J., Ximénez, C. M., & Olea, J.. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282

Tonidandel, S.,, & Quiñones, M. A.. (2000). Psychological reactions to adaptive testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 7-15.

Powell, Z. E. (1994). The psychological impacts of computerized adaptive testing methods. Educational Technology, 34, 41-47.

Wise, S. L., Plake, B. S., & et. al.,. (1989). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.

Way, W. D. (1998). Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 17-27.

Jette, A.,, Haley, S., Tao, W., Ni, P., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Zurek, M.. (2007). Prospective evaluation of the am-pac-cat in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Physical Therapy, 87, 385-398.

Volans, P. J. (1982). Pros and cons of tailored testing: An examination of issues highlighted with an automated testing system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 301-304.

Olea., J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Belchi, J.. (1996). Propiedades psicometricas du un test adaptivo informatizado do vocabulario ingles [Psychometric properties of a computerized adaptive tests for the measurement of English vocabulary]. Estudios de Psicologica, 55, 61-73.

Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., Hontangas, P. M., & Hernández, J. M.. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas de un test Adaptativo Informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an Emotional Adjustment Computerized Adaptive Test]. Psicothema, 17, 484-491.

Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.

Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D.. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.

Luo, X., Kim, D., & Dickison, P.. (2017). Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 275 - 290. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617726790

Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B.. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.

Reckase, M. D. (1977). Procedures for computerized testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 70, 351-356.

Chen, S. - Y. (2010). A Procedure for Controlling General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 393-409. doi:10.1177/0146621610367788

Doebler, A. (2012). The Problem of Bias in Person Parameter Estimation in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 255-270. doi:10.1177/0146621612443304

Taherbhai, H. M., & Young, M. J.. (2004). Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 301-18.

van der Linden, W. J. (2009). Predictive Control of Speededness in Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 25-41. doi:10.1177/0146621607314042

Brooks, S., & Hartz, M. A.. (1978). Predictive ability of a branching test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-419.

Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, S. H.. (2008). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.

Wang, S.,, & Wang, T.. (2001). Precision of Warm’s weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 317-331.

Wainer, H.,. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.

Thompson, N. A. (2007). A Practitioner’s Guide for Variable-length Computerized Classification Testing. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 1-13.

Mills, C. N.,, & Stocking, M. L.. (1996). Practical issues in large-scale computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 287-304.

Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.

Wightman, L. F. (1998). Practical issues in computerized test assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 292-302.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2009). a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(2).

Wang, L. - S., & Li., C. - S.. (2001). Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2 (4).

Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B.. (2011). Polytomous Adaptive Classification Testing: Effects of Item Pool Size, Test Termination Criterion, and Number of Cutscores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 1006-1022. doi:10.1177/0013164410393956

Green, B. F., Bock, B. D.,, Linn, R. L., Lord, F. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). A plan for scaling the computerized adaptive Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.

Taherbhai, H., & Seo, D.. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000