Seo, D. Gi, & Weiss, D. J.. (2015). Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 954-978. doi:10.1177/0013164415575147

Sekula-Wacura, R. (2000). A review of CAT review. Popular Measurement, 3, 47-49.

Seguin, S. P. (1976). An exploratory studyof the efficiency of the flexilevel testing procedure. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. In . F. Drasgow and J. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

Segall, D. O. (2001). Measuring test compromise in high-stakes computerized adaptive testing: A Bayesian Strategy for surrogate test-taker detection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.

Segall, D. O. (2004). A sharing item response theory model for computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 439-460. presented at the Win.

Segall, D. O., & Carter, G.. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Issues and approach. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1997). Current and future challenges. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp 257-269). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (1997). Applications of multidimensional adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Segall, D. O. (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Kieckhaefer, W. F., Vicino, F. L., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Validation of the experimental CAT-ASVAB system. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (2003). Calibrating CAT item pools and online pretest items using MCMC methods. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Segall, D. O. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing. In . Encyclopedia of social measurement. Academic Press.

Segall, D. O. (2010). Principles of Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 57-76). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Segall, D. O. (1997). The effects of motivation on equating adaptive and conventional tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331-354.

Segall, D. O. (1988). A procedure for scoring incomplete adaptive tests in high stakes testing. Unpublished manuscript. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., & Hetter, D. H.. (1997). Item pool development and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 117-130). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (2003). An adaptive exposure control algorithm for computerized adaptive testing using a sharing item response theory model. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Segall, D. O. (2000). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 53-73). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Segall, D. O. (1995). The effects of item compromise on computerized adaptive test scores. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Orlando, FL.

Segall, D. O. (1994). CAT-GATB simulation studies. San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331-354.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Bloxom, B. M., & Hetter, R. D.. (1997). Psychometric procedures for administering CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 131-140). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (2002). Confirmatory item factor analysis using Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation with applications to online calibration in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.

Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 181-198). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (1995). Equating the CAT-ASVAB: Experiences and lessons learned. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Segall, D. O., & Davey, T. C.. (1995). Some new methods for content balancing adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Segal, H. (1977). Operational Considerations in Implementing Tailored Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Seeley, L. C., Morton, M. A., & Anderson, A. A.. (1962). Exploratory study of a sequential item test. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office, Technical Research Note 129.

Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L.. (1999). Response time feedback on computer-administered tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Schwartz, C., Welch, G., Santiago-Kelley, P., Bode, R., & Sun, X.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing of diabetes impact: a feasibility study of Hispanics and non-Hispanics in an active clinic population. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1503-18. presented at the Nov.

Schwall, A., & Sinar, E.. (2011). Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Schreiber, M. D., Schneider, R. J., Schweizer, A., Beckmann, J. F., & Baltissen, R.. (2000). Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.

Schouwstra, S. (2017). Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Schoonman, W. (1989). An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Schoonman, W. (1989). An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

School-Renaissance-Institute,. (2001). The Development of STAR Early Literacy: A report of the School Renaissance Institute. Madison, WI: Author.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1997). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1999). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.

Schnipke, D. L.,, & Green, B. F.. (1995). A comparison of item selection routines in linear and adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 227-242.

Schneider, R. J., McLellan, R. A., Kantrowitz, T. M., Houston, J. S., & Borman, W. C.. (2009). Criterion-related validity of an innovative CAT-based personality measure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Schmitt, T. A., Sass, D. A., Sullivan, J. R., & Walker, C. M.. (2010). A Monte Carlo Simulation Investigating the Validity and Reliability of Ability Estimation in Item Response Theory with Speeded Computer Adaptive Tests. International Journal of Testing, 10, 230-261. doi:10.1080/15305058.2010.488098

Schmidt, F. L., & Urry, V. W.. (1976). Item parameterization procedures for the future. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 107-112.). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1977). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation (PB-276 748). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1978). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 265-273.

Schinoff, R. B., & Stead, L.. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing program at Miami-Dade Community College, South Campous. In Laguna Hill CA: League for Innovation in the community College.

Schartz, M. (1986). Measuring up in an individualized way with CAT-ASVAB: Considerations in the development of adaptive testing pools. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Franciso CA.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M., & Golub-Smith, M. L.. (1993). Introduction of a computer adaptive GRE General test (Research Report 93-57). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N.. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report No 95-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 98-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., Mills, C. N., & Durso, R.. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer-adaptive GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report 88-08ap; Educational Testing Service Research Report 95-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Scalise, K., & Wilson, M.. (2007). Bundle models for computerized adaptive testing in e-learning assessment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Sari, H. Ibrahim, & Raborn, A.. (2018). What Information Works Best?: A Comparison of Routing Methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 499-515. doi:10.1177/0146621617752990

Sapinkopf, R. C. (1977). A computer adaptive approach to the measurement of personality variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

Sands, W. A., & Gade, P. A.. (1983). An application of computerized adaptive testing in U. S. Army recruiting. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 10, 87-89.

Samejima, F. (2003). Criterion item characteristic curve function for evaluating the differential weight procedure adjusted to on-line item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCME. Chicago IL.