Export 480 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is S  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
PDF icon st99-01.pdf (426.36 KB)
Syang, A., & Dale, N. B.. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing in computer science: assessing student programming abilities. In Proceedings of the twenty-fourth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Indianapolis IN.
Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
Yigit, H. D., Sorrel, M. A., & de la Torre, J.. (2019). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 388-401. doi:10.1177/0146621618798665
Ueno, M., & Songmuang, P.. (2010). Computerized adaptive testing based on decision trees. In 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (Vol. 58, pp. 191-193). Sousse, Tunisia: IEEE Computer Sience.
Segall, D. O. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing. In . Encyclopedia of social measurement. Academic Press.
PDF icon se04-01.pdf (179.45 KB)
Ling, G., Attali, Y., Finn, B., & Stone, E. A.. (2017). Is a Computerized Adaptive Test More Motivating Than a Fixed-Item Test?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0146621617707556
Shermis, M. D., Stemmer, P. M., & Webb, P. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive skill assessment in a statewide testing program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(1), 49-67.
Shermis, M. D., Stemmer, P. M., & Webb, P. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive skill assessment in a statewide testing program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(1), 49-67.
Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1977). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation (PB-276 748). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.
Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1978). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 265-273.
Shermis, M. D. (1986). A computer-adaptive placement test for college mathematics. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Smittle, P. (1993). Computer adaptive testing: A new era. Journal of Developmental Education, 17 (1), 8-10.
Sapinkopf, R. C. (1977). A computer adaptive approach to the measurement of personality variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., Waller, N. G., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A comparison of two methods for the adaptive administration of the MMPI-2 content scales. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Atlanta GA.
Way, W. D., Lewis, C., & Smith, R. L.. (1995). A comparison of two IRT-based models for computerized mastery testing when item parameter estimates are uncertain. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Seo, D. Gi. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing
Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1997). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
Rotou, O., Patsula, L., Steffen, M., & Rizavi, S.. (2003). Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ro03-01.pdf (694.76 KB)
Schnipke, D. L.,, & Green, B. F.. (1995). A comparison of item selection routines in linear and adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 227-242.
PDF icon v18n3p197.pdf (1.07 MB)
Bridgeman, B., & Schaeffer, G. A.. (1995). A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Su, Y. - H. (2016). A Comparison of Constrained Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 346-360. doi:10.1177/0146621616639305
Smits, N., & Finkelman, M. D.. (2013). A Comparison of Computerized Classification Testing and Computerized Adaptive Testing in Clinical Psychology. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(2), 19-37. doi:10.7333/1302-0102019
Smith, R. L., & Lewis, C.. (2002). A comparison of computer mastery models when pool characteristics vary. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon sm02-01.pdf (691.36 KB)
Lewis, M. J., Subhiyah, R. G., & Morrison, C. A.. (1995). A comparison of classification agreement between adaptive and full-length test under the 1-PL and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419-440. doi:10.1177/0146621608327801
Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419–440.
Olsen, J. B., Maynes, D. D., Slawson, D., & Ho, K.. (1986). Comparison and equating of paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive tests of achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Eignor, D. R., & Schaffer, G. A.. (1995). Comparability studies for the GRE CAT General Test and the NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Pages