Export 339 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is C [Clear All Filters]
Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2
. (2017). Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students’ Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing
. (2017). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
. (2002). Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Schwall Sinar Item Calibration.pdf (1.15 MB)Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Schwall Sinar Item Calibration.pdf (1.15 MB)Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.
. (2000). Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
. (1989). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). . (2002).
. (2002).
Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.
. (2007). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (1993). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
. (1991). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2001). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
. (2002). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB)Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB)Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2002). . (2000).
Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.
. (2007). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (1983). Reckase '83.pdf (474.81 KB)The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (2024). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs
. (2017). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
. (2019). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.
. (1989). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (1983). Reckase '83.pdf (474.81 KB)How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu
. (2017). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In , Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In , Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
. (2004). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.
. (2003). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.
. (2006). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.
. (2006). Test anxiety and test performance under computerized adaptive testing methods. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2518.
. (1992). . (2000).
Differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 235-247.
. (2001). [Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.
. (2006). Applying Bayesian item selection approaches to adaptive tests using polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 1-20.
. (2006). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.
. (2002). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.
. (2008). Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.
. (2007). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.
. (2002). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
. (2005). Ability measurement, test bias reduction, and psychological reactions to testing as a function of computer adaptive testing versus conventional testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4233.
. (1982). . (2001).
Técnicas para detectar patrones de respuesta atípicos [Aberrant patterns detection methods]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 143-154.
. (2006). The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 115-127.
. (1997). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.
. (1997). Evaluation of the CATSIB DIF procedure in a pretest setting. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 177-199.
. (2004). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.
. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.
. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28, 330-5. presented at the Apr-May.
. (2008).