Export 497 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is C [Clear All Filters]
Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12
. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits.pdf (518.72 KB)The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.
. (2000). CAT item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
. (1998). Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552
. (2012). A content-balanced adaptive testing algorithm for computer-based training systems. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montr�al, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 306-314.
. (1996). A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 523-537. doi:10.1177/0146621618758289
. (2018). On Computing the Key Probability in the Stochastically Curtailed Sequential Probability Ratio Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 142-156. doi:10.1177/0146621615611633
. (2016). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.
. (1982). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.
. (1947). Is CAT Suitable for Automated Speaking Test?. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). A Comparison of Four Methods for Obtaining Information Functions for Scores From Computerized Adaptive Tests With Normally Distributed Item Difficulties and Discriminations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(5), 88-107. doi:10.7333/1312-0105088
. (2013). A comparison of adaptive mastery testing using testlets with the 3-parameter logistic model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
. (2005). ja05-01.pdf (644.06 KB)Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 2629-38. presented at the Jun 15.
. (2007). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.
. (2005). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903
. (2012). Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3
. (2006). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). jo02-01.pdf (280.31 KB)Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.
. (1991). Computer-based psychological testing. In . A. Elithorn and D. Jones (Eds.), Artificial and human thinking (pp. 83-93). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
. (1973). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Student Selection to Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education.
. (2012). CAT_StudentSelection1.pdf (120.81 KB)Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .
. (1980). The comparison of two tailored testing models and the effects of the models variables on actual loss. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
. (1974). Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration Mode Effects on a Statewide End-of-Course English Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 554-570. doi:10.1177/0013164407310132
. (2008). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063
. (2015). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07kim-kang.pdf (346.06 KB)Computerized adaptive testing: A pilot project. In . W. C. Ryan (ed.), Proceedings: NECC 86, National Educational Computing Conference (pp.172-176). Eugene OR: University of Oregon, International Council on Computers in Education.
. (1986). Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
. (2004). ki04-01.pdf (116.03 KB)Creating a K-12 Adaptive Test: Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates and Measurement Scales. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology
. (2011). A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1988). ki88-01.pdf (42.27 KB)A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 241-261.
. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.
. (1991). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.
. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.
. (1983). Kingsbury & weiss #1.pdf (642.36 KB)Computerized adaptive testing: A four-year-old pilot study shows that CAT can work. Technological Horizons in Education, 16 (4), 73-76.
. (1988). A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ki80-01.pdf (1.32 MB)A comparison of conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
. (2011). IACAT 2011 Kingsbury Continuous Testing.pdf (74.37 KB)A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (1983). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ki80-04.pdf (1.86 MB)Computerized adaptive measurement of attitudes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 20-30.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1985). Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine, 33, 1384-90. presented at the May 20.
. (2008). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). kr03-01.pdf (127.09 KB)Change in distribution of latent ability with item position in CAT sequence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education in New Orleans. LA.
. (2000). kr00-01.pdf (102.42 KB) . (1978).
. (1978).
CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.
. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.
. (2001). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (1999). A comparison of paper-and-pencil, computer-administered, computerized feedback, and computerized adaptive testing methods for classroom achievement testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1719.
. (1991). Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.
. (2003). Construction and validation of the SON-R 5-17, the Snijders-Oomen non-verbal intelligence test. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
. (1991). Computerized adaptive language testing: A Spanish placement exam. In Language Testing Research Selected Papers from the Colloquium, Monterey CA.
. (1987). . (2002).
Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.
. (1999). Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1999, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
. (1999). la99-01.pdf (578.11 KB)Comparing and combining dichotomous and polytomous items with SPRT procedure in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
. (1998). la98-01.pdf (374.46 KB) . (2000).
Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art in assessment at three community colleges. Laguna Hills CA: Author.
. (1988). Comparison of Exposure Controls, Item Pool Characteristics, and Population Distributions for CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 159-175. doi:10.1177/0013164411411296
. (2012).