Export 339 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is C [Clear All Filters]
. (2006). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.
. (2006). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.
. (2003). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.
. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In , Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In , Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-169). San Diego, CA. USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
. (1983). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
Reckase '83.pdf (474.81 KB). (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001
. (2017). Item Pool Design and Evaluation. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZAsqm1yNZlliqxEHcyyqQ_vOSu20xxZs
. (2019). How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001
. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.
. (2017). How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu
. (1983). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
Reckase '83.pdf (474.81 KB). (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.
. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2011). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB). (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB). (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.
. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.
. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.
. (1989). An applied study on computerized adaptive testing. Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. University of Groingen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
. (2017). Adaptivity in a Diagnostic Educational Test. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2000). Diagnostische programme in der Demenzfrüherkennung: Der Adaptive Figurenfolgen-Lerntest (ADAFI) [Diagnostic programs in the early detection of dementia: The Adaptive Figure Series Learning Test (ADAFI)]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie & -Psychiatrie, 13, 16-29.
. (2011). Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Schwall Sinar Item Calibration.pdf (1.15 MB). (2011). Adaptive Item Calibration and Norming: Unique Considerations of a Global Deployment. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Schwall Sinar Item Calibration.pdf (1.15 MB). (2002). An item response model for characterizing test compromise. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 163-179.
. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing
. (2017). Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students’ Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Item Response Time on Task Effect in CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2
. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.
. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.
. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.
. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.
. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.
. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.
. (2017). Concerto 5 Open Source CAT Platform: From Code to Nodes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=11eu1KKILQEoK5c-CYO1P1AiJgiQxX0E0
. (1997). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.
. (1998). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.
. (2000). The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 3938.
. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000
. (2004). Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 301-18.
. (2013). The Philosophical Aspects of IRT Equating: Modeling Drift to Evaluate Cohort Growth in Large-Scale Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 2–14. doi:10.1111/emip.12000
. (2023). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032
. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.
. (2007). Computerized classification testing with composite hypotheses. GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. St. Paul, MN: Graduate Management Admissions Council.
. (2007). A practitioner's guide to variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. presented at the 7/1/2009.