Export 126 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.
. (2009). I've fallen and I can't get up: can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(2), 83-101.
. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (2009). I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High-Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 83-101. doi:10.1177/0146621608324023
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.
. (2009). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat09rudner.pdf (202.22 KB). (2010). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test Computerized Adaptive Test. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 151-166). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2007). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test® computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat07rudner.pdf (134.53 KB). (1990). Computer testing: Pragmatic issues and research needs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9 (2), 19-20.
. (2011). Computer adaptive testing for small scale programs and instructional systems. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).
. (2002). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
ru02-01.pdf (45.1 KB). (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.
. (1996). A Type I error rate study of a modified SIBTEST DIF procedure with potential application to computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Alberta Canada.
. (2003). Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
ro03-01.pdf (694.76 KB). (1981). A comparison of a maximum likelihood and a Bayesian estimation procedure for tailored testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Los Angeles CA.
. (1997). A simulation study of the use of the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures for assessing DIF in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1961). An analysis of the application of utility theory to the development of two-stage testing models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Buffalo.
. (2009). Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research, 18, 125-36. presented at the Feb.
. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.
. (1990). Illustration of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. In Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Boston MA.
. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.
. (1992). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. San Francisco.
. (1997). The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.
. (1996). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.
. (2004). A computerized adaptive knowledge test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study. Medical Teacher, 26, 178-83. presented at the Mar.
. (1997). Self-adapted testing: Improving performance by modifying tests instead of examinees. Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 10(1), 83-104.
. (1996). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1995). Effects and underlying mechanisms of self-adapted testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 103-116.
. (1991). An empirical comparison of self-adapted and maximum information item selection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1987). Self-adapted testing: A performance improving variation of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 315-319.
. (1989). Individual differences in item selection in self adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
. (2000). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Methods Research Report No 391). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (2000). Classification accuracy and test security for a computerized adaptive mastery test calibrated with different IRT models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.
. (1999). Alternative item selection strategies for improving test security and pool usage in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education< Montreal. Canada.
. (2001). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2007). Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.
ro07-01.pdf (93.59 KB). (2002). The effect of test characteristics on aberrant response patterns in computer adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62, 3363.
. (2001). The effect of test and examinee characteristics on the occurrence of aberrant response patterns in a computerized adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2011). The Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item Selection and Score Estimation. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Riley Funk Dennis Lennox Finkelman Use of Decision Trees for Adaptive Item.pdf (456.04 KB). (2010). A comparison of content-balancing procedures for estimating multiple clinical domains in computerized adaptive testing: Relative precision, validity, and detection of persons with misfitting responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423.
. (2011). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
IACAT 2011 Riley Carle Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing.pdf (305.3 KB). (2007). Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: The GAIN Substance Problem Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 48-65.
. (2010). A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802
. (2012). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124
. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2000). A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
. (2002). Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 393-411.
. (2001). A monte carlo study of the feasibility of on-the-fly assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1997). Una solución a la estimatión inicial en los tests adaptivos informatizados [A solution to initial estimation in CATs.]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 2, 1-6.
. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
. (1996). Metodos sencillos para el control de las tasas de exposicion en tests adaptativos informatizados [Simple methods for item exposure control in CATs]. Psicologica, 17, 161-172.
. (1995). El control de la exposicin de los items en tests adaptativos informatizados [Item exposure control in computerized adaptive tests]. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Universidad Autonma de Madrid, Spain.
. (2003). Psychometric and psychological effects of item selection and review on computerized testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808.