Export 350 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is L [Clear All Filters]
Using unidimensional IRT models for dichotomous classification via CAT with multidimensional data. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston MA.
. (1996). What can we do with computerized adaptive testing and what we cannot do? . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Regional Language Center Seminar.
. (1990). Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1999, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
. (1999). la99-01.pdf (578.11 KB)An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category classification decisions in computerized classification test. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/2004, San Antonio, Texas.
. (2004). ji04-01.pdf (648.87 KB)Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.
. (1990). Computerizing statewide assessments in Minnesota: A report on the feasibility of converting the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments to a computerized adaptive format. Office of Educational Accountability, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.
. (2005). . (2004).
Adaptive exploration of user knowledge in computer based testing. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 3 (1), 322-327.
. (2004). An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers and Education, 52, 53-67.
. (2009). Adaptive Testing With Regression Trees in the Presence of Multidimensionality. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 293-316. doi:10.3102/10769986029003293
. (2004). Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.
. (2002). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137-149.
. (1992). A Bayesian method for the detection of item preknowledge in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 121-137.
. (2003). Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 81-104.
. (2008). . (1977). v01n1p095.pdf (402.88 KB)
. (1977).
Building algebra testlets: A comparison of hierarchical and linear structures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, xxx-xxx.
. (1991). Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.
. (2003). Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 15-23.
. (1991). Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245–264. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00015.x
. (2006). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.
. (2006). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903
. (2012). A Comparison of Constraint Programming and Mixed-Integer Programming for Automated Test-Form Generation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 435-456. doi:10.1111/jedm.12187
. (2018). A Comparison of Constraint Programming and Mixed-Integer Programming for Automated Test-Form Generation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 435-456. doi:10.1111/jedm.12187
. (2018). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802
. (2013). A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802
. (2013). Comparison of Exposure Controls, Item Pool Characteristics, and Population Distributions for CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 159-175. doi:10.1177/0013164411411296
. (2012). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.
. (1992). . (1994).
Computer applications in audiology and rehabilitation of the hearing impaired. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13, 471-481.
. (1980). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: CAT: A Bayesian maximum-falsification approach. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9, 412.
. (1995). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22 , 224-236.
. (1998). . (2002).
. (2000).
Is a Computerized Adaptive Test More Motivating Than a Fixed-Item Test?. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0146621617707556
. (2017). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2, 1-15.
. (2003). le03-01.pdf (226.37 KB)Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58, 239-57. presented at the Nov.
. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine, 33, 1384-90. presented at the May 20.
. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing in Early Education: Exploring the Impact of Item Position Effects on Ability Estimation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 437-451. doi:10.1111/jedm.12215
. (2019). Computerized adaptive testing: the future is upon us. Nurs Health Care, 14, 378-85. presented at the Sep.
. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing: Tracking candidate response patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 151-162.
. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.
. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing with different groups. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11 (2), 23-27.
. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 177-196.
. (2001). Computerized Classification Testing Under the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 114-128. doi:10.1177/0013164410391575
. (2011). . (1988).
Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 181-193.
. (1993). Computerized mastery testing with nonequivalent testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 65-76.
. (1992). Computerized Mastery Testing With Nonequivalent Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 65-76.
. (1992). v16n1p065.pdf (726.94 KB)Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 658-678. doi:10.1177/0013164406292084
. (2007). Conditional Item-Exposure Control in Adaptive Testing Using Item-Ineligibility Probabilities. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 398-418. doi:10.3102/1076998606298044
. (2007). Confidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 453-464.
. (1992). Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Shadow Tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291. doi:10.3102/10769986029003273
. (2004). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.
. (2005). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495
. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.
. (2005).